Opinion
HURIWA questions FG’S evacuation plan for Nigerians fleeing xenophobia in South Africa; demands justice, compensation*
By George Mgbeleke
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has received with mixed feelings the announcement by the Federal Government of Nigeria regarding the planned evacuation of over 1,000 Nigerians from South Africa following the resurgence of xenophobic attacks against African migrants, including Nigerian citizens.
In a statement signed by National Coordinator,Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko the group said, “While we commend the Federal Government for eventually assuming responsibility for the transportation costs of the affected Nigerians and facilitating their safe return home, HURIWA believes that the evacuation exercise, standing alone, is grossly inadequate and fails to address the far-reaching humanitarian, economic, diplomatic, legal and moral dimensions of this recurring tragedy.
“Indeed, the proposed evacuation raises more questions than answers.
The first and perhaps most fundamental question is: What becomes of the accumulated wealth, businesses, investments, landed properties, shops, vehicles, equipment, bank deposits and other assets painstakingly acquired by Nigerians who are now being compelled by fear, insecurity and targeted hostility to abandon their lives in South Africa?
“Many of these Nigerians did not arrive in South Africa yesterday. They have lived there for years and, in many cases, for decades. They have paid taxes, established businesses, employed workers, contributed to local economies and built lives through hard work and enterprise. If these citizens are now being forced out by organised xenophobic violence, does the Nigerian government have a framework for pursuing restitution, compensation and legal protection for their assets?
“Will their losses simply be written off as collateral damage while government celebrates the evacuation of victims from a hostile environment?”
HURIWA submits that evacuation without compensation amounts to managing the consequences of injustice while ignoring the injustice itself.
Secondly, what becomes of the thousands of Nigerians who have established families in South Africa?
Many Nigerians are legally married to South African citizens and have children who possess dual heritage and whose identities are intertwined with both countries. These are not merely immigration statistics; they are families, spouses, children and communities.
Has the Nigerian government negotiated safeguards for these mixed-nationality families?
What becomes of the Nigerian husband whose South African wife cannot immediately relocate?
What becomes of the South African spouse whose Nigerian partner is forced to leave?
What happens to children whose education, healthcare, social relationships and future are rooted in South Africa?
What legal and humanitarian mechanisms are being put in place to prevent the fragmentation of families and the emotional trauma that often accompanies forced displacement?
Thirdly, HURIWA is compelled to ask whether Nigeria has fully exhausted the diplomatic mechanisms available through the African Union, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the United Nations system and other international human rights platforms before resorting to mass evacuation.
Nigeria is not an insignificant nation on the African continent.
Nigeria played pivotal roles in the liberation struggles of Southern Africa. Nigerian taxpayers contributed enormously to anti-apartheid campaigns. Nigeria sacrificed diplomatic, economic and political resources in support of the freedom and dignity of Black South Africans during the dark years of apartheid.
It is therefore deeply troubling that decades after apartheid, Nigerians and other Africans continue to face violent hostility in a country whose liberation Nigeria vigorously supported.
The question therefore is this: Has Nigeria sufficiently leveraged its historic moral authority and diplomatic influence to compel South Africa to discharge its constitutional and international obligations to protect every lawful resident within its territory regardless of nationality?
The recurring xenophobic attacks in South Africa are not merely criminal incidents. They represent repeated assaults on the ideals of African unity, Pan-African solidarity and human dignity.
Even more disturbing is the perception across Africa that perpetrators of xenophobic violence often act with a sense of impunity because accountability remains weak and consequences are minimal.
HURIWA therefore demands that the Nigerian government publicly disclose the diplomatic measures it has initiated to ensure accountability from South African authorities.
Has Nigeria demanded compensation for victims?
Has Nigeria sought guarantees against future attacks?
Has Nigeria requested the prosecution of perpetrators and organisers of xenophobic violence?
Has Nigeria demanded an independent investigation into allegations that some security institutions have either failed to act decisively or have looked the other way while foreign nationals were targeted?
These are legitimate questions that require immediate answers.
Furthermore, HURIWA believes Nigerians deserve to know whether the Federal Government has considered proportionate economic and diplomatic responses to the persistent victimisation of its citizens.
South African businesses continue to thrive in Nigeria under the protection of Nigerian laws and security institutions. Their investments are protected. Their personnel operate freely. Their commercial interests are safeguarded.
Yet, Nigerian citizens in South Africa continue to live under the recurring shadow of xenophobic violence.
While HURIWA is not advocating reckless retaliation, we insist that diplomacy must be accompanied by consequences where repeated violations occur without meaningful corrective action.
No nation that values its citizens should appear indifferent when those citizens are repeatedly subjected to violence, intimidation and displacement abroad.
Another critical concern is the fate of the more than 1,000 Nigerians expected to return home.
What specific reintegration framework has the Federal Government developed for them?
How many jobs have been created for them?
What financial support packages have been approved?
What business recovery schemes have been established?
What psychological counselling and trauma-support programmes have been designed for victims who may have witnessed violence, lost loved ones, lost businesses or suffered severe emotional distress?
The return of displaced citizens should not mark the end of government responsibility; rather, it should signal the beginning of a comprehensive rehabilitation process.
Anything short of that would amount to transporting victims from one crisis into another.
HURIWA therefore calls for the immediate establishment of a Presidential Task Force on the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Returnee Nigerians from South Africa, comprising relevant ministries, financial institutions, private-sector stakeholders, civil society organisations and diaspora representatives.
Such a body should be mandated to develop emergency economic assistance programmes, access-to-credit facilities, vocational support initiatives, business recovery grants and long-term reintegration strategies.
Finally, HURIWA warns that the recurring pattern of xenophobic violence against Africans in South Africa represents a grave threat to continental integration and the vision of a united Africa.
Africa cannot preach unity while Africans are hunted, intimidated and displaced in fellow African countries because of their nationality.
The dignity, security and rights of every African must be protected wherever they reside on the continent.
The Federal Government of Nigeria must therefore move beyond evacuation and pursue a comprehensive strategy anchored on justice, accountability, compensation, diplomatic firmness, protection of family rights, economic rehabilitation and the defence of the fundamental rights of Nigerian citizens. Indeed, these values should incorporated or rather become the centrepiece of Nigeria’s foreign policy direction and engraved in the constitution that is being amended.
Nigeria owes its citizens nothing less.
Opinion
Estate Developer and Manager as Catalysts for National Development
By ESV. Irene C Onwubariri
In a dynamic nation like Nigeria, both estate developer and manager are indisputable drivers of national development. They occupy a strategic position in social development and economic growth, in various significant ways
Estate developer and manager pursue different but complementary roles. Each necessarily exists to supplement the duties of the other for shared and enhanced gains and to offset deficiencies.
Estate developer, for instance, accesses a tract of land and procures the basic authorizations and money, develops the strategic plans and builds the structures for leasing or rentals. As the duties of the developer are ending mark the beginning of the responsibilities of estate manager
The estate manager, on the other hand, administers the property’s operations, rentals, finances and maintenance. The manager acts on behalf of the property owner by relieving him of administrative and logistical burdens to ensure that the operations of the estate assets run in the most competitive and efficient manner.
Fundamentally, the duties of both the developer and manager stimulate the micro and macro economies and accordingly contribute largely to national development and the Gross Domestic Product of the nation
This postulation is evidence-based. National Bureau of Statistics’ (NBS) is indicative that the real estate sector is currently the third-largest contributor to Nigeria’s GDP, accounting for almost 10.8% of GDP (valued at over ₦41 trillion). The real estate sector according to Premium Times has supplanted the oil and gas sector in economic importance accentuated by rapid Urbanization:
This is further underscored by the fact that estate manager pursues both private and public property renovation and maintenance by driving management of the physical systems and network facilities. In so doing, providing safety nets for property assets and checkmating municipal deterioration. As a result, national property assets base is sustained thereby impacting positive change in the socio economic growth, reflecting in the GDP rise
However, by guaranteeing proper utilization of land resources through the deployment of professional skills, the developer constitutes a strategic facilitator to national development This is more so as the lands being utilized are for residential, commercial and government uses
Besides, estate manager’s role is further considered critical to the national economy because of his involvement in the management of national facilities and infrastructure. This statutory responsibility enables him to pursue strategic preventive maintenance measures thereby extending the lifespan of critical public assets and boosting government investment corridors.
Besides, the managers account for accurate valuation of properties thereby providing basis for proper assessment and taxation. In this way the managers provide reliable data that enables government generate income needed for public services and national development
As professionals, the estate developers and managers provide expertise for urban renewal , planning and development: They occupy a central place in physical development. They also offer strategic advice on feasibility studies, land utilization and renovation to achieve urban growth and
sustainability
Besides, developers and managers provide the required proficiency to ameliorate the housing deficit by ensuring equal distribution of housing resources towards meeting shelter needs of the nation
In line with the modern realities in the housing sector, developers and estate managers are significantly attuned to a dynamic shift that favours environmental waste reduction and green building practices. Compliance to this regulation guarantees long-term national sustainability objectives
By ESV. Irene C Onwubariri
In a dynamic nation like Nigeria, both estate developer and manager are indisputable drivers of national development. They occupy a strategic position in social development and economic growth, in various significant ways
Estate developer and manager pursue different but complementary roles. Each necessarily exists to supplement the duties of the other for shared and enhanced gains and to offset deficiencies.
Estate developer, for instance, accesses a tract of land and procures the basic authorizations and money, develops the strategic plans and builds the structures for leasing or rentals. As the duties of the developer are ending mark the beginning of the responsibilities of estate manager
The estate manager, on the other hand, administers the property’s operations, rentals, finances and maintenance. The manager acts on behalf of the property owner by relieving him of administrative and logistical burdens to ensure that the operations of the estate assets run in the most competitive and efficient manner.
Fundamentally, the duties of both the developer and manager stimulate the micro and macro economies and accordingly contribute largely to national development and the Gross Domestic Product of the nation
This postulation is evidence-based. National Bureau of Statistics’ (NBS) is indicative that the real estate sector is currently the third-largest contributor to Nigeria’s GDP, accounting for almost 10.8% of GDP (valued at over ₦41 trillion). The real estate sector according to Premium Times has supplanted the oil and gas sector in economic importance accentuated by rapid Urbanization:
This is further underscored by the fact that estate manager pursues both private and public property renovation and maintenance by driving management of the physical systems and network facilities. In so doing, providing safety nets for property assets and checkmating municipal deterioration. As a result, national property assets base is sustained thereby impacting positive change in the socio economic growth, reflecting in the GDP rise
However, by guaranteeing proper utilization of land resources through the deployment of professional skills, the developer constitutes a strategic facilitator to national development This is more so as the lands being utilized are for residential, commercial and government uses
Besides, estate manager’s role is further considered critical to the national economy because of his involvement in the management of national facilities and infrastructure. This statutory responsibility enables him to pursue strategic preventive maintenance measures thereby extending the lifespan of critical public assets and boosting government investment corridors.
Besides, the managers account for accurate valuation of properties thereby providing basis for proper assessment and taxation. In this way the managers provide reliable data that enables government generate income needed for public services and national development
As professionals, the estate developers and managers provide expertise for urban renewal , planning and development: They occupy a central place in physical development. They also offer strategic advice on feasibility studies, land utilization and renovation to achieve urban growth and
sustainability
Besides, developers and managers provide the required proficiency to ameliorate the housing deficit by ensuring equal distribution of housing resources towards meeting shelter needs of the nation
In line with the modern realities in the housing sector, developers and estate managers are significantly attuned to a dynamic shift that favours environmental waste reduction and green building practices. Compliance to this regulation guarantees long-term national sustainability objectives
Opinion
WAEC’s Night Examinations Violate Students’ Rights, Endanger Lives — HURIWA
By George Mgbeleke
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) expresses profound concern and outrage over reports that candidates sitting for the ongoing West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) are once again being compelled to write examinations late into the night due to administrative failures and logistical lapses by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC).
The disturbing reports that students in several examination centres across Nigeria were forced to remain in schools until 10 p.m. and beyond to write crucial examination papers amount to a grave violation of the rights and welfare of Nigerian children.
HURIWA recalls that similar incidents occurred during previous examination exercises, raising serious questions about whether any lessons were learned or corrective measures implemented by the examination body.
It is unacceptable that thousands of young Nigerians, many of whom are minors, are subjected to avoidable physical stress, psychological trauma, insecurity and health risks because of institutional inefficiency.
The right to education does not exist in isolation from other fundamental rights. Every Nigerian child has a right to dignity, security and protection from circumstances that expose them to danger. Forcing students to sit for examinations at night, often after waiting for several hours without certainty, places them at considerable risk and undermines the integrity of the examination process.
The safety implications are particularly troubling. Nigeria is currently battling widespread insecurity, including kidnapping, violent crime and other threats. It is therefore irresponsible and reckless for any institution to create conditions that compel students, teachers and parents to travel late at night after examination exercises.
Beyond the security concerns, educational experts have consistently maintained that prolonged waiting periods and mental exhaustion negatively affect students’ concentration, performance and overall well-being. A candidate who arrives at a centre prepared to write an examination in the afternoon but is compelled to sit for the same paper several hours later cannot reasonably be expected to perform at his or her optimum level.
HURIWA therefore calls on WAEC to immediately provide a comprehensive public explanation regarding the circumstances that led to these recurring delays and to outline concrete measures being implemented to prevent future occurrences.
The Federal Ministry of Education must also institute an independent inquiry into the repeated logistical failures associated with the conduct of WASSCE examinations in Nigeria. Where negligence or incompetence is established, appropriate sanctions should be imposed.
Furthermore, HURIWA urges the National Assembly Committees on Education to summon relevant officials of WAEC to explain why Nigerian students continue to experience avoidable disruptions that compromise both their safety and academic performance.
The future of Nigerian children must never be sacrificed on the altar of administrative inefficiency. Educational institutions exist to support and protect students, not to expose them to unnecessary hardship and danger.
HURIWA stands firmly with parents, teachers and students who have demanded accountability and immediate reforms in the conduct of public examinations across the country.
Opinion
HURIWA Hails Death Sentence on Owo Church Killers, Calls for Similar Punishment for Kidnappers and Terrorists Nationwide*
By George Mgbeleke
Prominent pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has welcomed the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja sentencing four terrorists to death for their involvement in the gruesome attack on St. Francis Catholic Church, Owo, Ondo State, in which dozens of innocent worshippers were massacred during a church service in June 2022.
HURIWA in a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko describes the verdict as a landmark victory for justice, a triumph for the rule of law, and a strong message that those who engage in terrorism and mass murder will ultimately face the full weight of the law.
The leading human rights advocacy group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) commends Justice Emeka Nwite for delivering a courageous and painstaking judgment based on overwhelming evidence presented before the court. The judgment has restored public confidence in the justice system and provided a measure of closure to the families of the victims whose lives were brutally cut short by agents of terror. We in HURIWA express our view that the appeals arising from this judgment should witness a very rapid hearing and determination by both the Appellate court and the court of last resort the Supreme Court of Nigeria. We are of the view that this matter must be determined within three months just as the governor of Ondo State should sign their death warrants so their public execution is carried out without delay.”
HURIWA specifically applauds the Department of State Services (DSS) for its professionalism, persistence and intelligence-driven operations that led to the arrest, investigation and successful prosecution of the terrorists. The successful conviction demonstrates what can be achieved when patriotic, competent and committed Nigerians are entrusted with the leadership of strategic security institutions.
This milestone should encourage security agencies across the country to intensify efforts towards dismantling terrorist networks, kidnapping syndicates and violent criminal gangs that continue to threaten national security.
The Rights group further calls on the judiciary to impose similar stringent punishments on convicted kidnappers, terrorists and mass murderers across Nigeria. The growing menace of kidnapping for ransom and terrorism has inflicted untold pain on millions of Nigerians and should attract the highest penalties permitted by law to serve as a deterrent.
HURIWA notes that the Owo judgment stands in sharp contrast to what many Nigerians viewed as a disappointingly lenient disposition towards the mastermind of the bombing of the Catholic Church in Zuba, Abuja, during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari. That controversial outcome left many citizens questioning the nation’s commitment to justice and accountability in terrorism-related offences.
The rights group recalls that under the previous administration, several high-profile terrorism cases generated public outrage because of perceptions that perpetrators were not adequately punished despite the gravity of their crimes. The latest judgment therefore marks a welcome departure from that troubling trend and signals a renewed determination by the Nigerian state to confront terrorism decisively.
HURIWA urges President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to continue supporting security agencies and the judiciary in the fight against terrorism and violent extremism. The association also calls on relevant authorities to ensure that all legal procedures required to give effect to the judgment are pursued diligently.
The message from the Owo judgment must be clear and unmistakable: Nigeria must never become a safe haven for terrorists, kidnappers and mass murderers. Those who shed innocent blood must know that justice will catch up with them, no matter how long it takes.
-
Politics1 year agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Politics10 months agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy10 months agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Entertainment2 years agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
Sports4 months agoBayelsa-born ex-football star’s son, Opuama donates spike shoes to Athletics Association
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
Law & Crime11 months agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
