Connect with us

Opinion

IMPORTED WIVES: Inside the Hidden Struggles, Control, and Silent Battles of African Women Abroad

Published

on

Stacey Ukaobasi

Written by Stacey Ukaobasi, Founder of the Forum for Child Rights Promotion.

Inside the hidden struggles, heartbreak, and awakening of African immigrant wives who seek love abroad but find control instead. The conversation is a factual presentation of what a lot of African girls married by men who live abroad and then move to live in their new homes that they merely know much about. It is not meant to scare anyone but this is just a warning note of what some ladies confront in their new homes abroad.

Across African diaspora communities, a quiet tragedy unfolds — a story of love, control, and survival.
They call them imported wives — women brought from their home countries to join men abroad, often in search of love, family, and stability.
But beneath the surface lies a painful reality of manipulation, emotional abuse, and, in the worst cases, deadly violence.

A Marriage Between Two Worlds

For many men who have lived abroad for years, marriage becomes less about affection and more about meeting cultural or family expectations. When pressure mounts from home, they return to marry — often through arrangements that prize obedience over compatibility.

She’s young, innocent, respectful, from a good home;
.she’ll make a good wife”
the families say.

That very innocence becomes the reason she is controlled. Once abroad, she is expected to remain submissive, grateful, unquestioning. The same relatives who found her feel entitled to her obedience, reminding her constantly that they found her. She loses her sense of belonging and struggles to prove herself to people who see her as beneath them.

Gratitude becomes a prison, not a virtue.
These women are expected to fit perfectly into homes where love is conditional, respect is one-sided, and silence is demanded.

Ngozi’s Story — A Good Wife Turned Invisible

Ngozi’s story reflects this all too well. Her husband, Chike, had lived in the U.K. for over a decade before returning home to marry. His sisters found Ngozi “avery good girl”Within months she joined him abroad.

Her dreams of love vanished quickly. Chike worked long hours, spoke little, and discouraged her ambitions.

Do nursing he insisted. “That’s how families survive here.

Ngozi obeyed, believing that was part of being a good wife. But soon her life revolved entirely around duty. The same family that once praised her began treating her as inferior, constantly reminding her of her loyalty to them.
She was no longer a wife — she was property.

Chioma’s Story — A Dream Turned Nightmare

Chioma came abroad only for a visit. She met a man who encouraged her to stay, promising love and a better life.
Back home she had stability, independence, peace. She gave it all up for love.

The man she trusted turned abusive — controlling her finances, humiliating her, making her feel worthless. The abuse became physical. Violent beatings left her with scars and broken bones that required surgery.

Undocumented and terrified, Chioma was trapped. Even with the injuries, she kept having children; he beat her up until her day of delivery.
Alone, isolated, hopeless in a foreign land, she finally left after the third pregnancy — but her body and spirit bore the permanent marks of betrayal.

Jane’s Story — When Love Turns Deadly

Jane thought she had found a man of faith. Her husband called himself a pastor and spoke softly about God, humility, and purpose.
He brought her to America with dreams of building a ministry together.

Instead, Jane became his worker, not his partner. He sent her to nursing school, controlled her income, dictated her every move. While she worked long shifts, he managed her money — and her life.

When Jane finally decided to leave — exhausted, hurt, ready to start anew — he became enraged.

“I made you who you are. You can’t survive without me.

She survived anyways after leaving him but his obsession didn’t end. He stalked her relentlessly. One day, in a fit of rage, he shot her in the head and then turned himself in.

Jane’s story became a chilling reminder of how quickly control turns to violence, and love to tragedy.

Emma’s Story — The Generational Narcissist

Here is Emma, a chronic narcissist who had no business being married. Yet, he managed to convince Angella — an immigrant who came abroad only for a visit to marry him. What began as a promise of love soon became a prison of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion.

Show me a narcissist, and I will show you a father who was one before him. Emma’s story didn’t begin with him — it began with a father consumed by money, control, and the illusion of power.

This was a man who saw women only as objects of service, boldly declaring in front of his son’s wife.

“Women are just for having babies — after that, they’re useless.
Shamelessly speaking unimaginable degrading things about his own wife that he’s been married to for decades to his son.

That moment revealed generations of twisted masculinity, passed down as tradition. This same father, who had abandoned his own wife in old age, came to live with his son and made it his mission to dominate the home.

He wanted to know everything about his son’s household and speaks I’ll about his own sons wife in public instead of protecting his sons home.He wanted to know how much Angella earned, what she spent on the children,even why she was listed on Emma’s health insurance. He saw her not as family, but as an obstacle to his control.

His obsession with power cost him any relationship with his daughter-in-law. He wanted Emma all to himself and even demanded that Angella sign an agreement to stay away from her husband. In his warped sense of authority, he told her that Emma would only be allowed to visit her and the children on Sundays — as if she were an outsider in her own marriage.

And yet, this same man expected Angella to serve him like a maid — to cook for him, cater to him, and treat him with respect.

How can you try to separate a woman from her husband, destroy her peace, and still expect her to serve you?
That is pure narcissism — control disguised as culture, manipulation wrapped in tradition.

His toxic influence shaped Emma into his perfect reflection: charming to outsiders, cruel at home, driven by ego and image rather than love and responsibility.

Angella was already struggling with his sons chronic narcissistic abuse and this made everything worse.

Emma surrounded himself with irresponsibility — men who lived in bars, men who glorified recklessness, ex-convicts with no vision. He spent his earnings on them and on the streets, trying to impress strangers, while his family suffered in silence.

When Angella lost a seven-month pregnancy that nearly took her life, Emma never showed up because he was busy on the streets when hospital begged for blood donations — he ignored his family and never showed up and his wife and kids didn’t even know his whereabouts. Yet that same month, he had all the time in the world to accompany his blind uncle to Nigeria.

For six long weeks, Angella fought for her life — in and out of the hospital — while still had to care for her children alone,get them ready for school,pay bills while on sick bed and also holding her home together.
She faced unimaginable pain — not just from physical loss, but from the cruel absence of a husband who chose the streets over his family.

Emma wanted the image of a husband, not the responsibility of one. He cared more about appearing like a “good man” than being one.

He tried to gather family pictures when the need arose-images he was never truly present to take — just to show off when it suited him. Every photo he shared was a performance, a false display of unity that existed only in his imagination. Behind every smiling picture was a woman broken by neglect and a home already abandoned.

Emma’s family know him well but pretend to called him a good man,none of them knew his wife’s tears or the pain he caused behind closed doors. His reputation mattered more than her life.

This was not love. It was cruelty dressed in charm, abandonment disguised as freedom — generational narcissism, passed from father to son, justified by culture and pride.

To the world, Emma is a husband.
To his wife and children, he is a stranger — a man who traded love for ego, fatherhood for barstools, and family for fleeting validation.

Angella’s suffering is not an isolated story. It represents countless women trapped in similar cycles — women who came abroad in search of a better life, only to find themselves silenced, burdened, and broken by men who never learned the true meaning of care.

Until men unlearn the idea that control equals love, and leadership means domination, families like Emma’s will continue to fall apart — leaving women like Angella to raise strength from their scars.

The Single Mothers — The Most Vulnerable

There’s another group of women often overlooked — single mothers who have fought through pain to rebuild their lives.

Many have endured betrayal, abandonment, or divorce. They save for years, work tirelessly, and finally relocate with their children for a better life. But when they arrive abroad, some”encounter men who see their resilience as weakness.

These men view single mothers as vulnerable — assuming they will accept anything for the sake of stability and their children. They manipulate them emotionally, knowing that many will endure anything just to keep peace and give their kids stability.

Family and friends sometimes add to the pain, saying things like:

“No man will marry a woman with children again.
“You should be grateful he accepted you.”
“At least you can now call yourself a married woman.
“He will change just Put him in prayer

Those words are cruel.
They reduce a woman’s worth to her marital status, erasing her strength and dignity. They make her feel indebted to a man who, in truth, may be destroying her spirit.

That was Ngozi’s reality in Canada. A single mother who worked hard to relocate with her children, she met a man who seemed kind — until his true colors showed.
He openly brought women to their home whenever she stepped out. He insulted and beat her regularly. He drank heavily, spent nights with girlfriends, and attacked Ngozi when she protested.

One brutal beating left her with a spinal injury she will never fully recover from.
He isolated her from friends and family, poisoning every connection she had. Whenever she dared to complain, he would twist the story to make others cut her off.
She was left with no one to talk to.
Ngozi’s world became silent. She battled depression and trauma — all while caring for her children.
Her story reflects the silent suffering of countless immigrant women trapped in abusive marriages but too afraid to speak out or leave.

Here comes CONTROL DISGUISED AS CARE:
Abuse in these relationships often hides under the mask of care.

“Don’t make too many friends”
“Stay home — people here will spoil you.”
“I’m only protecting you”

Behind those words lies fear and insecurity. These men isolate their wives, restrict their movements, and gaslight them into self-doubt.

Some go further — cheating openly and humiliating their wives in the process.
To justify their actions, they tell their girlfriends they were forced into marriage by their families or trapped in loveless relationships.

You can imagine how those girlfriends see the wives — as obstacles, as women who don’t deserve their husbands.
It’s a double humiliation: while the wife suffers silently at home, she’s also ridiculed by those who believe his lies.

In reality, these men play victims to the world while being oppressors in their homes — a cruel form of psychological abuse that destroys the very core of a woman’s being.

Ironically, many of these same men later claim that “African women abroad are not loyal”like OGA WHY ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A SLAVE?

what they seek is not loyalty — it’s slavery. They avoid women already abroad because those women have independence and confidence. Instead, they go back home to find wives they can mold into obedience.

Control is not love.
Submission is not respect.
True loyalty grows from mutual trust — not fear.

A Message to African Men

Dear African men,
If you do not love a woman, do not marry her.
Do not bring her abroad to make her your caregiver, your worker, or your financial solution.
Do not turn marriage into a project or an act of charity.

Marriage is not meant to enslave a woman or silence her dreams.
If your goal is control, not companionship, please — do not marry.

Because no matter how long it takes, the woman you try to suppress will one day find her strength and walk away.
And you will be left lonely, searching again for the peace you destroyed.

Every woman deserves love — not survival.

A Message to Every Woman Reading This

To every woman who has loved and lost herself in the process — you are not alone.
To every woman rebuilding her life after pain — your courage is your power.
To every woman silenced by fear — your voice still matters.

You are not defined by who hurt you.
You are defined by how you rise after being broken.
And you deserve love that brings peace,not pain.

THE HIDDEN VICTIMS-The Children Who Watch in Silence

When a home becomes a battlefield, it is not only the husband and wife who bleed — the children do too.
They may not have scars on their skin, but their hearts carry wounds that if care is not taken may last a lifetime.

A broken home is better than broken children.
Staying for the sake of the kids only teaches them that pain is normal.

They grow up believing love equals pain.
Boys learn control,girls learn endurance.
That is how abuse becomes generational.

Children who witness emotional abuse lose their childhood to survival. They grow up insecure, mistrusting, and unsure what healthy love looks like. Many become caretakers too young, comforting a crying mother, managing tension, cleaning up after chaos.
Some fathers even turn children against their mothers, weaponizing fatherhood.
A father should be a protector not a source of fear because when he becomes a source of fear, he destroys the sacred bond of safety.

A BROKEN HOME IS NOT FAILURE
IT IS FREEDOM.

A broken home is better than broken children.
Women, you are not selfish for choosing peace ,you are saving generations.
Choosing to walk away from abuse is not failure. It is courage.
It is the decision to break the chain before it breaks your children.

Healing begins when a woman realizes she is not responsible for a man’s demons.
She cannot heal him by shrinking herself.
She cannot fix a family by destroying her own soul.

How to Stop the Cycle

1. Teach Men Emotional Responsibility.
Boys must learn that leadership is not domination and strength is not control.
2. Empower Women.
Immigrant women must know their rights and have access to community support and education that fosters confidence.
3. Protect the Children.
Schools, churches, and community groups must recognize and intervene early. Therapy and counseling can heal trauma before it hardens.
4. Redefine Culture.
Culture should protect, not destroy. No culture should justify abuse.

TO EVERY FATHER — your children are watching. They will either become you or spend a lifetime healing from you.
To every mother — your strength is not in silence. When you choose peace, you teach peace.
To every community,stop looking away. Support those in pain and educate the next generation that love is not control.

IN CONCLUSION
Imported wives are not statistics,they are women with dreams, dignity, and destiny.
They are the backbone of many homes, raising children far from their roots and building strength from sorrow.

But strength should not be born from suffering.
It’s time to protect them, protect their children, and break the generational cycle — one story, one home and one truth at a time.
ONE POINT REMAINS REMARKABLE: IF THE KIDS ARE NOT SAFE THERE WILL BE NO FUTURE.

*Ms. Stacey Ukaobasi is the USA based human rights activist and writer.

Opinion

They Ruin Our Schools, School Their Kids Abroad

Published

on

By

Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko

By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko

This is certainly the season of intense competition among politicians in Nigeria to show off their foreign-educated children in the mass media, for whatever reason.

Perhaps they do this to let the rest of us—the wretched of the earth, in the words of Frantz Fanon, the French psychiatrist and political philosopher—know that they are building political empires and grooming successors who will take over from where they stopped destroying Nigeria.

Some of these politicians were once governors who purportedly built state universities but would never send their own children to those institutions. This is indeed their season and, from our observations, these politicians are increasingly educating their children abroad because Nigerians have failed to insist on accountability and transparency in government. This is why they send their children overseas for schooling and have started showing them off in the media for the rest of the people to see.

Most recently, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mr. Nyesom Wike, was seen in what appeared to be a private jet alongside his political acolytes and associates, flying to the United Kingdom, where his daughter graduated from one of the country’s expensive universities.

Mr. Wike ensured that the graduation ceremony of his only daughter featured prominently across mainstream media in Nigeria. After all, many newspapers have been repeatedly patronised by the Federal Capital Territory Administration under his leadership to showcase the roads and flyovers built since he became minister. These generous advertisements have generated substantial revenue for the newspapers, which are now, in turn, repaying those favours—funded with public money—by prominently displaying to millions of ordinary Nigerians that Wike’s daughter has graduated overseas.

The minister and his associates also organised lavish wining and dining sessions, which were extensively reported with photographs in the Nigerian media.

Mind you, Save the Children recently published a report stating that 36.2 million Nigerians across 26 states are facing acute hunger. Yet, the political elite continue to celebrate their children’s graduations and rub these flamboyant parties of wining and dining in our faces. Many other serving political office holders have also recently showcased their foreign-educated children in newspapers.

This was followed by the Governor of Anambra State, whose younger daughter also graduated from a university in the United Kingdom. The Governor’s wife issued a lengthy press statement in which she praised her daughter to the high heavens.

The only apparent exception among these celebrations of foreign education is the Governor of Osun State, whose daughter graduated from a Nigerian-based university owned by her uncle, the father of musician David Adeleke (Davido).

Many senators, members of the House of Representatives, and governors have children who hold second passports. Likewise, the son of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Seyi Tinubu, travelled last month to watch the recently concluded FIFA Club World Cup with his family, where they sat in the VIP section. Seyi was shown on television conversing with the American-born TikTok personality IShowSpeed, who was informed that Seyi is Nigeria’s First Son because he is the son of the current President. Amusingly, the American social media influencer jokingly asked Seyi to persuade his father to give him a Nigerian passport.

Perhaps this request was informed by the perception in parts of the Western world that African political leaders wield enormous powers and often act without due regard for due process. That may explain why the influencer jokingly requested a Nigerian passport from Seyi.

But why are politicians who wield power in Nigeria unwilling to trust either public or private universities within the country to educate their children?

Ironically, the politician who owns Baze University in Abuja was also shown in the media celebrating the graduation of one of his children abroad, despite operating one of Nigeria’s most expensive private universities.

The simple reason governors and ministers send their children to schools abroad is that they have easy access to enormous financial resources. In Nigeria, winning elections and holding public office have come to be seen as tickets to unearned wealth, and sadly, this is what many politicians have made public office represent.

This reality becomes evident when we examine some of the cases filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against politicians who have fallen out of favour with the ruling party. We are repeatedly shown how some of these politicians amassed enormous wealth to our detriment while they were supposed to be serving the public.

Recently, the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the permanent forfeiture of 48 properties linked to former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), to the Federal Government.

Delivering judgment, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had successfully established that the assets were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities, while the respondents failed to provide satisfactory evidence of legitimate sources of income used to acquire them.

Among the forfeited assets are Rayhaan University and its facilities in Kebbi State, Rayhaan Radio, luxury hotels, residential buildings, commercial plazas, filling stations, warehouses, factories, large parcels of land, and several other high-value properties spread across Abuja, Kebbi, and Kano States.

The ruling followed an interim forfeiture order granted earlier this year, after which the EFCC invited interested parties to challenge the action. Although Malami and several associates contested the forfeiture, the court ruled that they failed to discharge the legal burden required to overturn the Commission’s case.

The judgment marks one of the most significant non-conviction asset forfeiture decisions secured by the EFCC in recent times.

The disturbing reality is that politicians holding public office often use their positions to corner enormous privileges for themselves, and their proximity to unmerited wealth is unmistakable.

They train their children in European and American schools and then splash photographs of their children’s graduations before us, almost as if to ask, “What can you do about it?”

We are, therefore, trapped in a Catch-22 situation, where the very people responsible for destroying, undermining, and destabilising not only our educational system but also the nation’s broader social and strategic infrastructure send their children to some of the most expensive universities in the Western world while doing virtually nothing to repair the broken schools attended by millions of ordinary Nigerians.

This pathetic situation can only change if citizens resolve to transform the country’s political culture by refusing to be bribed into voting for the same politicians who continue to preside over the deterioration of Nigeria’s educational and governance systems.

From available data and the overwhelming weight of evidence, many ordinary Nigerians appear content to accept the crumbs that fall from politicians’ tables and then repeatedly vote them back into lucrative political offices—not to serve the people but to continue enriching themselves at the public’s expense.

Unfortunately, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has yet to undertake sustained public enlightenment campaigns against vote-buying. Consequently, we may continue to witness these routine media displays of politicians proudly celebrating the foreign university graduations of their children.

Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko is the Founder of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) and a former National Commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Zamfara Bleeds Again: HURIWA Urges President Tinubu to Declare a State of Emergency and Restore Constitutional Order

Published

on

By

Zamfara Bleeds Again: HURIWA Urges President Tinubu to Declare a State of Emergency and Restore Constitutional Order
By George Mgbeleke
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) is deeply outraged by the latest massacre of at least 23 innocent farmers in Sauna/Ruwan Gora community of Talata Mafara Local Government Area of Zamfara State. This latest atrocity is yet another grim reminder that Zamfara has become a vast killing field where terrorists exercise authority with near impunity while innocent citizens continue to pay the ultimate price.

HURIWA in a statement signed by its National Cordinator,Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko extends its heartfelt condolences to the bereaved families and stands in solidarity with the people of Zamfara who have endured years of relentless killings, kidnappings, village burnings, displacement and destruction of livelihoods.

This latest massacre is not an isolated incident. It is part of a sustained campaign of terror that has persisted for over a decade despite repeated military operations and enormous public expenditure on security.

According to recent assessments by Amnesty International, hundreds of people have been killed in Zamfara within the last two years alone, while hundreds more have been abducted. The organisation further reported that since the onset of the security crisis, hundreds of communities have been sacked and vast areas across 13 local government areas remain under the influence or control of armed bandits, creating one of Nigeria’s gravest humanitarian emergencies.

Independent conflict monitoring by ACLED, as referenced by the European Union Agency for Asylum, recorded about 760 violent security incidents in Zamfara between January 2024 and August 2025, resulting in approximately 2,806 fatalities. The report described Zamfara as one of Nigeria’s most dangerous states, with violence affecting every local government area.

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) also continues to document repeated mass displacements across the state. In one incident in June 2026 alone, attacks in Gummi Local Government Area displaced nearly 8,800 residents, illustrating the devastating humanitarian consequences of the continuing violence.

These statistics paint a disturbing picture of a state where constitutional governance is steadily giving way to the authority of armed criminal groups.
HURIWA is therefore compelled to ask: how many more innocent Nigerians must die before extraordinary constitutional measures are considered?

The association believes that the deteriorating security situation in Zamfara now meets the threshold of a grave emergency requiring decisive federal intervention.
Accordingly, HURIWA calls on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to invoke the relevant constitutional provisions for the declaration of a state of emergency in Zamfara State, just as extraordinary constitutional measures were taken in Rivers State under a different set of circumstances. If constitutional institutions can be suspended to address political instability, it would be difficult to justify withholding similar intervention where thousands of lives have been threatened by sustained terrorist violence.
HURIWA therefore urges the President to consider measures that would allow the Federal Government to take direct control of security coordination in the state for a defined period, strengthen military and intelligence operations, restore civil authority in occupied communities and protect the fundamental rights to life and security guaranteed under the Constitution.
The association stresses that any constitutional measures adopted must strictly comply with the provisions of the Constitution, remain temporary, be subject to legislative oversight and focus primarily on restoring public safety and democratic governance.
HURIWA further notes with concern that notorious bandit kingpin Bello Turji rose to prominence partly because previous attempts at negotiating peace with armed groups created opportunities for several criminal leaders to consolidate influence, regroup and expand their operational networks instead of laying down their arms permanently. Security experts have repeatedly questioned the effectiveness of those initiatives, arguing that while intended to reduce violence, they often enabled some criminal groups to rearm and strengthen their hold over vulnerable communities.
The latest massacre demonstrates that piecemeal responses have failed. Zamfara requires sustained military pressure, improved intelligence gathering, effective border surveillance, prosecution of terror financiers, protection of farming communities, humanitarian support for displaced persons and the complete restoration of lawful government authority throughout the state.
The Federal Government must equally investigate every allegation of official collaboration with criminal networks and ensure that any public officer found aiding or protecting terrorists faces the full weight of the law.
Nigeria cannot continue to normalise the mass slaughter of its citizens.
History will judge today’s leaders not by the number of condolences they issue after every massacre, but by the courage and effectiveness of the actions they take to stop the bloodshed.
The time for half measures has passed. Zamfara deserves peace. Nigerians deserve security. The Constitution demands no less.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Why ‘They’ Hate General Christopher Musa

Published

on

By

Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko

By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko

The Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (rtd.), made the front pages of major newspapers on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, after becoming the target of agents of misinformation and disinformation who spread the false rumour that he had tendered his resignation to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Those who fabricated the story circulated a message in the Hausa language, which they falsely attributed to the Minister, across various social media platforms. The Minister, who had the good fortune of moving from the prestigious office of Nigeria’s Chief of Defence Staff—the highest-ranking serving Army General in the country—to the equally significant position of Minister of Defence upon his retirement, could not understand how, when, or to whom he had supposedly communicated his “resignation.” An individual using a name and profile photograph circulated the Hausa-language message claiming that the Minister of Defence had confirmed his resignation.

The Minister dismissed the report as nothing more than a fabricated tale. Indeed, many Nigerians who saw the story did not take it seriously, as social media is often awash with unverified reports, misinformation, and outright falsehoods that are later corrected when those concerned issue official denials or report such content to the relevant platforms.

Fundamentally, many Nigerians believe it is rare for public office holders to voluntarily resign from highly paid political appointments. In the public perception, most office holders leave only when removed by the appointing authority. Consequently, few people believed the original story. When General Musa publicly debunked the rumour, Nigerians were therefore not surprised. While the public may have dismissed the report, the Minister himself expressed shock and wondered why anyone would wish him to abandon such an important office, which had been entrusted to him by President Bola Tinubu.

As expected, the Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (rtd.), said on Tuesday that he was “shocked” by reports of his supposed resignation and vowed to take legal action against those responsible for spreading the false information.

General Musa said he had no idea where the rumours originated. Responding to questions after a closed-door meeting with President Bola Tinubu at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, the former Chief of Defence Staff said:

“I am not going anywhere. I have never discussed this. I don’t even know who the person is that brought that information. But whoever it is, we will take legal action against them.”

The Minister denied ever discussing resignation and said the reports were the handiwork of people uncomfortable with the administration’s improving security record.

“Whoever it is, we will take legal action against them. I am sure we will get them. He will come and explain who gave him such information.”

Musa described the rumours as a deliberate attempt to undermine public confidence in the administration’s security gains.

“We are surprised. I was shocked when I saw that. I don’t know where that came from.

“But you always expect that there will be people who will not be happy when things are going well. Security is improving, things are getting better, and for them, that is a sad development. They always want to make it look as if it is not so.”

He added that his private meeting with the President was a routine security briefing and that President Tinubu had expressed satisfaction with the military’s performance.

According to him:

“I just came back from briefing Mr President on the current security situation, and he is very happy with us. We are going to continue doing well.”

I believe General Musa has chosen not to speculate publicly about those behind the rumour. At the very time the false report was circulating, he had reportedly travelled to China on official duty. Likewise, the Minister of State for Defence was reportedly on an official trip to Turkey on matters relating to Nigeria’s national security.

In my view, there are two possible groups that may have been behind the rumour that General Musa had resigned.

First, General Musa’s appointment came as a surprise to many observers. He was not known as a card-carrying member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) before President Bola Ahmed Tinubu appointed him, reportedly on the basis of merit, competence, and his extensive military experience.

One group that may continue to oppose General Musa consists of hardliners within the APC who regard him as an outsider occupying a position they believed should have gone to one of their own within the party’s inner circle. It had been expected in some quarters that, after the departure of the former Minister of Defence, either another party loyalist or the Minister of State for Defence would be elevated to the position. That expectation was not realised, and some may therefore harbour resentment toward General Christopher Musa.

This is not intended to implicate the Minister of State for Defence. On the contrary, he appears to be a committed nationalist who, in my opinion, has no connection whatsoever with any alleged campaign against his colleague. He is himself reportedly facing political opposition from rivals in his home state who are unhappy with his close relationship with President Tinubu.

The second group, in my opinion, consists of hardline Islamists who were dissatisfied with the replacement of a Muslim minister by General Musa. Although Musa bears a common Muslim name and is from Northern Nigeria, he is a Christian. While he was born in Sokoto, one of the historic centres of Northern Nigeria, his religious identity and background distinguish him from those who may have expected the office to remain in Muslim hands.

According to this perspective, such religious hardliners may seek every opportunity to portray General Musa as ineffective or unsuccessful. Yet, despite being of Southern Kaduna origin, he continues to serve as Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

General Musa has also publicly advocated strong military action against Boko Haram, ISWAP, and other terrorist groups operating in Nigeria. It is therefore argued that extremist elements who oppose such measures would naturally view his leadership unfavourably.

Beyond religious and political considerations, there are also those within both political and military circles who are alleged to benefit from the persistence of insecurity in Nigeria. Such individuals, if they exist, would have little interest in seeing the Minister of Defence succeed in weakening terrorist networks through more aggressive military operations across the North-East, North-West, and North-Central regions.

As General Musa continues to monitor developments carefully—as the popular Nigerian expression goes, “there is nothing Musa no dey see for gate”—it is expected that the source of this latest episode of misinformation and disinformation may eventually be identified, allowing the law to take its course.

Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko is the Founder of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) and a former National Commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Latest

Politics3 hours ago

2027: You cannot afford to fail Nigeria, INEC Chairman tells staff

By George Mgbeleke The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Joash Amupitan, has charged staff members of...

General News9 hours ago

OBYC Worldwide fault Ineife led IYC over planned protest against Bayelsà Industrialist. ….urges IYC to respect for Court Process

By David Owei,Bayelsa The Ogbia Brotherhood Youth Council (OBYC) Worldwide has condemned the planned protest over the legal dispute involving...

General News9 hours ago

OBYC Worldwide fault Ineife led IYC over planned protest against Bayelsà Industrialist. ….urges IYC to respect for Court Process The Ogbia Brotherhood Youth Council (OBYC) Worldwide has condemned the planned protest over the legal dispute involving Azikel Group President, Dr. Azibapu Godbless Eruani, CFR, and Mr. Kariyai Daukoru, describing the action as unnecessary while the matter remains before a competent court. OBYC, in a statement issued on Saturday and made available to newsmen, urged Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Central Zone Chairman, Comrade Peres Ineife, to suspend the proposed protest and allow the judicial process to run its course. It also appealed to the newly elected IYC Worldwide President, Dr. Doubra Collins Okotete, to promote dialogue and reconciliation among the parties involved in the Aviation Training initiative. OBYC maintained that Dr. Eruani’s aviation training initiative was a philanthropic programme designed to empower Bayelsa youths and rejected allegations that he intended to victimise anyone. The Council further called on Ijaw youths, political leaders and stakeholders to exercise restraint, respect the rule of law, and avoid actions capable of undermining the judiciary or disrupting peace.

By David Owei,Bayelsa The Ogbia Brotherhood Youth Council (OBYC) Worldwide has condemned the planned protest over the legal dispute involving...

Sports9 hours ago

More Talents Spotted in Bayelsa United/Prosperity Cup Tourney ‎ ‎… As Competition Enters Matchday Three ‎

By David Owei,Bayelsa ‎ ‎The quest to return Bayelsa United to the Nigeria Premier Football League, NPFL next season is...

General News9 hours ago

Two Fishermen Feared Dead ln Bayelsa Ocean

By David Owei,Bayelsa Two fishermen have been declared missing after their boat capsized off the coast of Opu-Okumbiri in Brass...

Business & Economy13 hours ago

NCDMB Commends Brentex on $50m Steel Pipe Facility, Assures of Industry Patronage

By David Owei The Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) has lauded Brentex Petroleum Services Limited on the significant...

Politics13 hours ago

Osun Decides: Stakeholders Set for Citizens’ Town Hall to Promote Credible Poll*

By David Owei As the August 15, 2026 Osun State Governorship Election enters its final 21 days, the Civil Society...

Business & Economy15 hours ago

Tinubu, from Mama Akara to Mama Akwete

By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a lucky man. He is a lucky husband and a lucky...

Law & Crime15 hours ago

Withdraw Your Shoot-on-Sight Order, It’s Unconstitutional-HURIWA tells IGP

By George Mgbeleke Prominent pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has asked the...

Politics1 day ago

Stop “Ghosting”,Fix Pension Crisis, Build On Reforms We Started-Atiku tells Tinubu

By Our Correspondent Presidential flag bearer of the African Democratic Congress,( ADC), and former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has faulted...

Trending