{"id":10560,"date":"2026-01-26T04:09:25","date_gmt":"2026-01-26T04:09:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/?p=10560"},"modified":"2026-01-26T04:09:25","modified_gmt":"2026-01-26T04:09:25","slug":"tax-reform-laws-split-reps-as-house-spokesman-dismisses-interim-report-of-house-caucus-on-alteration-of-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/2026\/01\/26\/tax-reform-laws-split-reps-as-house-spokesman-dismisses-interim-report-of-house-caucus-on-alteration-of-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Tax Reform Laws Split Reps, as House Spokesman Dismisses Interim Report of House Caucus on Alteration of Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By Our Correspondent<br \/>\nIn a bid to clear air on stand of the House of Representatives on the alleged alterations on new Tax Laws, House of Representatives has said that it has taken note of media reports claiming that the Minority Caucus constituted an ad hoc committee on Friday, January 2, 2026, to further examine the recently enacted tax laws, and that the said body has reportedly submitted an interim report.<\/p>\n<p>This is contained in a statement issued to newsmen by the House Spokesman, HonAkin Rotimi Jnr on Sunday in Abuja<\/p>\n<p>According to the statement,&#8221;the House recognises the legitimate role of the Minority Caucus within parliamentary democracy and affirms its right to express dissenting opinions, engage in policy advocacy, and raise public concerns, it is necessary to clearly distinguish between political activities and the formal parliamentary processes of the House.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Under the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives (Eleventh Edition), the authority to constitute an ad hoc committee of the House rests solely with the House acting in plenary, or with the Speaker exercising powers conferred under the Standing Orders. No political caucus, whether majority or minority, possesses the procedural authority to establish a committee that carries the status of a parliamentary body.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Political caucuses the image maker said remain important platforms for consultation and coordination among Members. However, they do not possess institutional authority within the House and do not possess investigative authority, oversight jurisdiction, or the power to summon persons or demand official documents.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He explained that any action taken by a caucus in this regard is therefore,&#8221; non-binding, informal, and without legal or institutional consequence. Any committee constituted outside the processes prescribed by the Standing Orders lacks institutional recognition.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Accordingly, any interim or final report emanating from such a caucus-led body cannot be laid before the House, cannot be received as a parliamentary document, and does not form part of the official legislative or oversight record of the National Assembly.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The House further said it considers the action attributed to the Minority Caucus to be procedurally improper, inconsistent with parliamentary norms, liable to set an unwholesome precedent, and to create unnecessary public confusion, particularly since the matter has already been addressed through established parliamentary mechanisms.<\/p>\n<p>He recalled that in December 2025, the House of Representatives duly constituted a bipartisan ad hoc committee following the intervention of an opposition Honourable Member who formally drew the attention of the House to the existence of multiple documents purporting to be official gazettes of the tax legislation. <\/p>\n<p>The Spokesman further noted the committee, which comprises Honourable Members from both the ruling and opposition parties.he posited is specifically to examine those allegations.<\/p>\n<p>He added that committee was constituted by the House in line with the Standing Orders, remains in force, and continues to discharge its assignment. Upon the conclusion of its work, it will lay its report before the House in plenary.<\/p>\n<p>Subsequently, the National Assembly, acting jointly through both Chambers, published the official Gazette of the National Assembly and issued Certified True Copies of the enacted tax laws. The legislative process has therefore been concluded and given full legal effect.<\/p>\n<p>The National Assembly he added has also formally disowned and debunked any unofficial documents in circulation, reiterating that only the gazetted versions and duly certified copies issued by the National Assembly constitute authentic legislative instruments.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore in this context, &#8220;the establishment of a parallel caucus-led committee and the circulation of purported interim findings serve only to compound public misunderstanding on an issue that has been institutionally resolved and overtaken by events.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The House of Representatives the House Spokesman said remains committed to transparency, accountability, and effective legislative oversight. <\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, these objectives must be pursued strictly within the framework of the Constitution, the Standing Orders, and long-established parliamentary conventions that safeguard institutional order, legal certainty, and public confidence.<\/p>\n<p>The House image-maker urged the general public to toe rigth path for the avoidance of doubt, noting that committees constituted by the House in plenary or by the Speaker have parliamentary authority. <\/p>\n<p>Members of the public he added are therefore advised that any committee or report not constituted or authorised by the House or the Speaker should be regarded strictly as a political initiative and not as an official action of the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Our Correspondent In a bid to clear air on stand of the House of Representatives on the alleged alterations on new Tax Laws, House of Representatives has said that it has taken note of media reports claiming that the Minority Caucus constituted an ad hoc committee on Friday, January 2, 2026, to further examine [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1905,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[5995,135,1798],"class_list":["post-10560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-crime","tag-affirms","tag-democracy","tag-parliamentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10560"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10561,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560\/revisions\/10561"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyechoes.ng\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}