Opinion
Akpabio’s New Year Resolution: Forgiveness, Faith, and Leadership
By
Hon. Eseme Eyiboh, MNIPR
In politics, silence is often louder than speech, for it speaks in the language of calculation and consequence. Forgiveness, when declared by a powerful man, is louder still—a thunderclap in a quiet chamber. It unsettles expectations, invites suspicion, and demands interrogation, not because it is weak, but because power is never presumed innocent when it chooses mercy.
When Senate President Godswill Akpabio, GCON, announced his New Year resolution to forgive all offenders and withdraw every suit he had instituted, Nigeria’s political class instinctively reached for its usual tools—cynicism, calculation, conspiracy. This decision, however, does not fit comfortably within the margins of the country’s familiar scripts of power and vendetta; it demands a slower reading.
The context itself matters. On New Year’s Day 2026, Akpabio was not behind a podium, flanked by politicians. He was seated in Sacred Heart Parish, Uyo, listening to a homily—not as Nigeria’s number-three citizen, but as a humble, God-fearing parishioner. The priest, Reverend Father Donatus Udoette, preaching with quiet authority and pastoral fervor, exhorted his congregants to let go of past hurts and choose peace over grievance. Akpabio would later say that, at some point, he realised the sermon was speaking directly to him.
The announcement that followed shortly after bore the unmistakable imprint of that moment. About nine defamation suits would be withdrawn, including the ₦200 billion case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, arising from allegations he had consistently denied and publicly rejected. Other cases, some involving his close associates, would go the same way. In a political culture where litigation has become an extension of reputation management, this was no minor gesture. Akpabio had been unapologetic about defending his name through the courts. The law, in his hands, had been both shield and sword. To voluntarily lay it down is to interrupt a habit of power.
The question, therefore, is not whether Akpabio could afford to forgive. It is why he chose to do so.
To answer that, one must resist the temptation to isolate this act from the man’s broader leadership story. Akpabio has always lived publicly in dual registers. There is the assertive politician who, as governor of Akwa Ibom State, left behind concrete evidence of ambition fulfilled—flyovers, boulevards, hospitals, model schools, an international airport, and an international stadium. Supporters invoke the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur: the facts speak for themselves.
Then there is the other register: the man who frames his political journey in spiritual terms; who describes his rise from the shadows to national limelight as evidence of divine ordering and grace; who once called himself, without irony, “the most ranked Christian in government.” A man who sees himself not merely as a participant in Nigeria’s politics, but as an instrument within a providential design—God’s will, he believes, for Nigeria at this moment.
In Nigeria, faith in politics is common. Stability of faith is rarer. Akpabio’s Christianity is not episodic. It has shaped how he understands authority itself. Power, in this worldview, is not merely seized or negotiated; it is entrusted. And what is entrusted carries moral obligation.
This is where forgiveness ceases to be sentimental and becomes political philosophy.
The same drive for tangible outcomes has characterised, albeit differently, his tenure as Senate President. It has been defined less by flamboyance than by control. The Senate he leads has been unusually productive and notably calm—more than ninety-six bills passed in two years, with over fifty-eight assented to by the President. In a chamber once notorious for theatrics, this stability is not accidental. It reflects a leadership style that values restraint over spectacle and consensus over conquest.
While his action was inspired, it also makes political sense. Withdrawing defamation suits fits neatly into this logic. Legal battles consume attention. They tether leaders to old grievances. They narrow the emotional bandwidth required for institutional leadership. To let them go is to reclaim focus—and to recommit to what ultimately matters: nation-building.
Critics will argue that forgiveness is easier from a position of strength. They are right. That is precisely why it matters. In fragile political systems, restraint by the powerful sets a tone no code of conduct can enforce. It lowers the temperature. It changes incentives.
Nigeria’s public sphere has become deeply adversarial. Every disagreement is framed as insult. Every critique is personalised. Politics has learned to confuse hostility with toughness. In such an environment, Akpabio’s choice rightly disrupts a dangerous rhythm.
Faith provides the language; humility provides the discipline. Humility here is not self-effacement. No one can accuse Akpabio of being unaware of his own stature. Rather, it is a confidence that does not require constant vindication. As the late global gospel icon, Uma Ukpai, once told him: “Only fruit-bearing trees draw missiles. If you are drawing missiles, it means you are bearing fruit.”
To accept that counsel is to understand leadership as emotional labour. To forgive is not to deny injury; it is to refuse to let injury define governance.
There is, of course, a strategic dimension. Nigerian politics does not permit innocence. The decision comes at a time when Senate unity is under constant scrutiny and rumours of internal challenge circulate freely. Choosing reconciliation over escalation strengthens institutional cohesion. It preserves authority without making it brittle.
Yet strategy does not cancel sincerity. In Nigerian leadership, the sacred and the secular are not opposing realms but overlapping obligations. Godswill Akpabio’s Catholic identity, deeply rooted in his home state, has always been both personal and public. He has hosted bishops at the national level. He is planning a worship centre within the National Assembly complex. These are not gestures of convenience; they are expressions of a worldview in which governance, godliness, and morality intersect.
This is why the withdrawal of lawsuits should be read not merely as personal forgiveness but as public modelling. Akpabio has often spoken of nation-building as a collective task, insisting that it requires citizens to rise above division and embrace shared purpose. Forgiveness, in this sense, becomes civic pedagogy.
Nigeria suffers from obvious physical infrastructure deficits. It also suffers from what might be called spiritual infrastructure decay. Distrust is habitual. Anger is efficient. Leaders who demonstrate emotional regulation contribute to national repair in ways budgets cannot capture.
The implications extend directly into legislative leadership. Managing one hundred and nine senators with competing ambitions requires more than procedural mastery. It demands moral authority—authority that flows not only from rules, but from example.
By choosing forgiveness over litigation, Akpabio strengthens his hand not through coercion but through credibility. He signals that power can afford generosity; that leadership does not require perpetual combat; that not every insult deserves a reply.
There is risk, of course. Forgiveness can be misread as weakness. Silence can be exploited. But leadership that waits for perfect safety rarely leads. Akpabio’s resolution accepts vulnerability as the price of example.
What emerges, then, is a synthesis: the force of developmental leadership from his gubernatorial years, the finesse of institutional management as Senate President, obedience to God and now a claim to moral authority through public restraint.
Nigeria often produces leaders who deliver material progress but corrode trust, or leaders who speak ethically but govern ineffectively. Akpabio’s gesture attempts to collapse that false choice.
To be clear, the true test lies ahead. Forgiveness must be sustained, not performed once and shelved. Its power will be measured by whether it cools tempers, reshapes conduct, and encourages reciprocal restraint.
For now, Akpabio has offered an unconventional lesson in Nigerian statecraft: that surrendering legal claims can strengthen authority; that stable faith produces calm rather than noise; and that humility, properly understood, is not the absence of confidence but its highest expression.
In a country struggling to rebuild trust while confronting insurgency, economic hardship, and climate anxiety, reconciliation is not a luxury. It is governance.
Sometimes, the most radical act in politics is not retaliation, but restraint. And with his New Year’s resolution, Senator Godswill Akpabio, the Senate President has demonstrated precisely that.
Rt Hon Eseme Eyiboh mnipr is the Special Adviser, Media/Publicity and Official Spokesperson to the President of the Senate
Opinion
WAEC’s Night Examinations Violate Students’ Rights, Endanger Lives — HURIWA
By George Mgbeleke
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) expresses profound concern and outrage over reports that candidates sitting for the ongoing West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) are once again being compelled to write examinations late into the night due to administrative failures and logistical lapses by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC).
The disturbing reports that students in several examination centres across Nigeria were forced to remain in schools until 10 p.m. and beyond to write crucial examination papers amount to a grave violation of the rights and welfare of Nigerian children.
HURIWA recalls that similar incidents occurred during previous examination exercises, raising serious questions about whether any lessons were learned or corrective measures implemented by the examination body.
It is unacceptable that thousands of young Nigerians, many of whom are minors, are subjected to avoidable physical stress, psychological trauma, insecurity and health risks because of institutional inefficiency.
The right to education does not exist in isolation from other fundamental rights. Every Nigerian child has a right to dignity, security and protection from circumstances that expose them to danger. Forcing students to sit for examinations at night, often after waiting for several hours without certainty, places them at considerable risk and undermines the integrity of the examination process.
The safety implications are particularly troubling. Nigeria is currently battling widespread insecurity, including kidnapping, violent crime and other threats. It is therefore irresponsible and reckless for any institution to create conditions that compel students, teachers and parents to travel late at night after examination exercises.
Beyond the security concerns, educational experts have consistently maintained that prolonged waiting periods and mental exhaustion negatively affect students’ concentration, performance and overall well-being. A candidate who arrives at a centre prepared to write an examination in the afternoon but is compelled to sit for the same paper several hours later cannot reasonably be expected to perform at his or her optimum level.
HURIWA therefore calls on WAEC to immediately provide a comprehensive public explanation regarding the circumstances that led to these recurring delays and to outline concrete measures being implemented to prevent future occurrences.
The Federal Ministry of Education must also institute an independent inquiry into the repeated logistical failures associated with the conduct of WASSCE examinations in Nigeria. Where negligence or incompetence is established, appropriate sanctions should be imposed.
Furthermore, HURIWA urges the National Assembly Committees on Education to summon relevant officials of WAEC to explain why Nigerian students continue to experience avoidable disruptions that compromise both their safety and academic performance.
The future of Nigerian children must never be sacrificed on the altar of administrative inefficiency. Educational institutions exist to support and protect students, not to expose them to unnecessary hardship and danger.
HURIWA stands firmly with parents, teachers and students who have demanded accountability and immediate reforms in the conduct of public examinations across the country.
Opinion
HURIWA Hails Death Sentence on Owo Church Killers, Calls for Similar Punishment for Kidnappers and Terrorists Nationwide*
By George Mgbeleke
Prominent pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has welcomed the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja sentencing four terrorists to death for their involvement in the gruesome attack on St. Francis Catholic Church, Owo, Ondo State, in which dozens of innocent worshippers were massacred during a church service in June 2022.
HURIWA in a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko describes the verdict as a landmark victory for justice, a triumph for the rule of law, and a strong message that those who engage in terrorism and mass murder will ultimately face the full weight of the law.
The leading human rights advocacy group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) commends Justice Emeka Nwite for delivering a courageous and painstaking judgment based on overwhelming evidence presented before the court. The judgment has restored public confidence in the justice system and provided a measure of closure to the families of the victims whose lives were brutally cut short by agents of terror. We in HURIWA express our view that the appeals arising from this judgment should witness a very rapid hearing and determination by both the Appellate court and the court of last resort the Supreme Court of Nigeria. We are of the view that this matter must be determined within three months just as the governor of Ondo State should sign their death warrants so their public execution is carried out without delay.”
HURIWA specifically applauds the Department of State Services (DSS) for its professionalism, persistence and intelligence-driven operations that led to the arrest, investigation and successful prosecution of the terrorists. The successful conviction demonstrates what can be achieved when patriotic, competent and committed Nigerians are entrusted with the leadership of strategic security institutions.
This milestone should encourage security agencies across the country to intensify efforts towards dismantling terrorist networks, kidnapping syndicates and violent criminal gangs that continue to threaten national security.
The Rights group further calls on the judiciary to impose similar stringent punishments on convicted kidnappers, terrorists and mass murderers across Nigeria. The growing menace of kidnapping for ransom and terrorism has inflicted untold pain on millions of Nigerians and should attract the highest penalties permitted by law to serve as a deterrent.
HURIWA notes that the Owo judgment stands in sharp contrast to what many Nigerians viewed as a disappointingly lenient disposition towards the mastermind of the bombing of the Catholic Church in Zuba, Abuja, during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari. That controversial outcome left many citizens questioning the nation’s commitment to justice and accountability in terrorism-related offences.
The rights group recalls that under the previous administration, several high-profile terrorism cases generated public outrage because of perceptions that perpetrators were not adequately punished despite the gravity of their crimes. The latest judgment therefore marks a welcome departure from that troubling trend and signals a renewed determination by the Nigerian state to confront terrorism decisively.
HURIWA urges President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to continue supporting security agencies and the judiciary in the fight against terrorism and violent extremism. The association also calls on relevant authorities to ensure that all legal procedures required to give effect to the judgment are pursued diligently.
The message from the Owo judgment must be clear and unmistakable: Nigeria must never become a safe haven for terrorists, kidnappers and mass murderers. Those who shed innocent blood must know that justice will catch up with them, no matter how long it takes.
Opinion
Terrorism: President Tinubu’s motion without movement*
By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko
Since the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu kickstarted, it has been characterized by a major flaw: its incapacity and inability to substantially curb the fast rising terror attacks on schools and communities just as these attacks have been very bloody with thousands of casualties left on their trails.
This year 2026, has seen some of the most heart-rending, most painful, traumatic and vexatious terrorist attacks on the very soft targets of schools whereby the well-armed terrorists kidnapped hundreds of children and took them into the bushes and then wait to open up negotiations with government officials.
These rash of bloody violence have been unleashed in Borno, Yobe, Kebbi, Sokoto, Plateau, Kaduna and most recently in Oyo.
By the last count, over a thousand school children have been whisked away into the dreaded forests by these terrorists armed with the deadliest of sophisticated military grade weapons.
The children taken away from their schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State, were videoed by their heartless captors whereby they were subjected to all kinds of indignities and torture of the most gruesome and beastial genres.
The headmaster of one of the schools kidnapped by the terrorists was shown on video being decapitated by the Islamists.
The speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly revealed that the terrorists demanded that the legislative House makes a law to concede some portions of the state to them even when they are strange Fulanis. The terrorists also made financial demands. In one of the previous hostage situations, it was later revealed that the terrorists were paid with billions of Naira in foreign denominated currency conveyed to their hideouts allegedly in helicopter by the government intermediary.
Tinubu’s administration through the office of the National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu stridently denied and debunked the claims which circulated even in international media. Comically, the terrorists have advanced their trade to include posting live videos on tiktok and Facebook and recently, a video circulated showing hundreds of millions of Naira the terrorists collected as ransom to free some of their captives and the Fulani terrorist was heard speaking in poor Hausa language saying that they are swimming in hundreds of millions of money. Whilst the terrorists smile amidst what they consider as good turnovers, the victims and their families wail and are forced to sell off their priced assets just to secure the release of their children and the president and his administration are absent and inactive in all of these. So you now see why Nigerians are angry with the present government at the centre.
Above all else, Nigerians are aggrieved with the Federal government for not displaying enough empathy each time these terrorists attacked communities or schools and the citizens said they are disappointed with these tactless and unsympathetic commentaries emanating especially from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu whenever citizens are hauled into the forests by terrorists. Even when these reactions sound sympathetic, citizens demands accountability from the government by way of decisively crushing the terrorists and not just to engage in mere meaningless political rhetoric.
The position of the majority of Nigerians demanding expressions of profound empathy by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is justifiable and this writer will in the subsequent lines of this piece articulate and show a compilation of ten of such unsympathetic and insensitive comments made by President Tinubu following these kidnappings and violence by terrorists unleashed on the citizens.
10 Reactions of President Tinubu to Terrorist Attacks | May 2023 – May 2026:
Woro Village, Kwara State – June 2023
Attack: Gunmen killed up to 162 people, burned shops + traditional ruler’s home. Tinubu blamed Boko Haram jihadists
Reaction: Condemned the “beastly attack” against villagers who rejected jihadists’ ideology. Ordered an army battalion to secure the area. Said he was “enraged that the attackers killed community members who rejected their obnoxious attempt at indoctrination”
Source: Standard Media; Presidency statement
Plateau State Communities – Dec 2023/Jan 2024
Attack: “Mindless gunmen” attacked Ruwi, Hurti, Tadai, Manguna, Dafo villages in Bokkos LGA
Reaction: Vowed “severe punishment under the law”. Directed security agencies to hunt down attackers. Said “intermittent attacks should have no place… we will work harder to exterminate forces of evil”. Directed NEMA to provide relief
Source: State House Abuja
Niger State – Kasuwan Daji, Demo Village – Dec 2024
Attack: Bandits killed over 30 people, burnt market, abducted women/children
Reaction: “These terrorists have tested the resolve of our country… They must face the full consequences… No matter who they are… they must be hunted down”. Sent condolences + mandated security to intensify operations near forests
Source: AllAfrica; THISDAY.
Benisheikh, Borno State – April 9, 2026
Attack: ISWAP attacked 3 military bases in Pulka, Mungono, Benisheikh. Commanding officer Brig-Gen Oseni Braimah + soldiers killed
Reaction: Expressed “deep sorrow” over fallen troops, called them “unforgettable heroes”. Said insurgents’ counterattack shows “desperation”. Urged troops: “Do not lose heart, do not be weary… Our resolve to defeat terrorism is stronger than ever”
Source: AllAfrica; Premium Times; TheStar
Maiduguri, Borno State – March 17, 2026
Attack: Coordinated suicide bombings hit hospital, market, post office. 23+ killed
Reaction: “I mourn those who lost their lives… These acts of terror are the final desperate attempts by criminals… There is no place in Nigeria where terrorists will find safety. We will locate them, confront them, and completely defeat them. Nigeria will not succumb to fear”. Directed security chiefs to move to Maiduguri + emergency agencies to care for injured
Source: State House Abuja
Ngoshe, Gwoza LGA, Borno – March 6, 2026
Attack: Boko Haram attacked Ngoshe community. Military + civilians killed, some in friendly fire
Reaction: “Heartfelt condolences to families… attack is a heartless assault on hapless citizens”. Urged Borno residents “not to succumb to fear”. Commended military for killing scores of terrorists. Directed armed forces to “intensify efforts to protect civilians… prevent attacks on military installations”
Source: State House Abuja; Channels TV; Voice of Nigeria
Angwan Rukuba, Jos North, Plateau – April 2, 2026
Attack: Suspected bandits attacked bar, 28 people died. Viral video of woman with son’s body
Reaction: Consoled families in Jos: “There is nothing I can give you, whether money in billions… but console you and promise you that this experience will not repeat itself… The best solution is for justice to be done”. Directed security to “unearth and find the killers” + install cameras
Source: TheCable; The Nation
Kahir Village, Kagarko LGA, Kaduna – April 2026
Attack: Wedding guests killed/abducted
Reaction: Condemned both Jos + Kahir attacks as “barbaric and cowardly”, vowed perpetrators “would be brought to justice”. “Anyone who will sneak under cover of night and kill defenceless citizens… is a heartless coward”
Source: The Nation
Borno Military Formation – General Borno attack 2025/2026
Attack: Repeated coordinated attacks on military positions in Borno
Reaction: Commended “courage and fighting spirit of our patriotic troops who successfully repelled coordinated attacks”. “The Monday attacks were desperate acts of evil-minded terrorist groups. Our gallant military will curtail and put them down”
Source: State House Abuja
General Counter-Terrorism Stance – 2024 Summit
Context: No specific attack, but major policy statement
Reaction: At African counter-terrorism summit, Tinubu said “May we do everything required to defeat this challenge so that… historians will discuss how today became a major turning point in Africa’s defeat of terrorist scourge”. Noted Nigeria is “dealing decisively with drivers of violent extremism, resumed prosecution of Boko Haram suspects”
Source: State House Abuja.
What I can get from all of these reactions which at best represent motion without movement just like the barber’s chair is the famous phrase spoken by Macbeth in Act 5, Scene 5 after he learned that his wife, Lady Macbeth had died. His quote which also graphically demonstrates the lack of political will by President Tinubu to solve the persistent attacks by terrorists, goes thus: “Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”.
These Reaction of President Tinubu to Terrorists attacks nationwide without following them up with actions to decimate these terrorists are full of sound and fury, signifying nothing really for the citizens who are facing horrendous violence of these terrorists that have appeared as if they are stronger than the Nigerian government. So, are these terrorists stronger than the current federal administration? Your guess is as good as mine.
*EMMANUEL NNADOZIE ONWUBIKO, is the founder of HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA AND WAS NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF NIGERIA.
-
Politics1 year agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Politics9 months agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy10 months agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Entertainment2 years agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
Sports4 months agoBayelsa-born ex-football star’s son, Opuama donates spike shoes to Athletics Association
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
Law & Crime11 months agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
