Law & Crime
Dismiss PDP’s petition on Edo Guber, INEC tells Tribunal as judgement reserved
By Abdul-Ganiyy Akanbi
The Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal has adjourned indefinitely judgement in the petition filed against the September 21, 2024 election of Governor Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate, Mr Asue Ighodalo.
The tribunal adjourned the verdict delivery in the disputed election on Monday in Abuja after taking arguments from the petitioners, comprising Ighodalo and PDP and the respondents which included; the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Okpebholo and the APC.
At the adoption of final written addresses, Justice Wilfred Kpochi, who permitted the petitioners and the respondents some minutes to adumbrate on their arguments, told parties that the date for judgement delivery in the petition would be communicated to them when ready.
At Monday’s proceedings, a former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN stood for the electoral body, while Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN addressed the tribunal on behalf of Governor Okpebholo and Chief Emmanuel Ukala, SAN argued for the APC.
The INEC lawyer said that the petition cannot stand the test of time based on the grounds that the tribunal could not annul the September 21, 2024 governorship election because it was not one of the reliefs sought by the petitioners.
The senior lawyer also told the tribunal that it could not declare Ighodalo and PDP as winners of the election in the light of their own assertion that the election was invalid.
Speaking on the claim of non-compliance pleaded by the petitioners, Agabi said it was weak as it was not accompanied by the appropriate relief which was nullification of election.
He also said that the claim of majority of lawful votes pleaded by the petitioners could not avail them since their other claim was that the election was invalid.
He also argued that the number of polling unit agents called as witnesses represented an insignificant or even negligible per cent of the number of polling units in Edo.
Another ground that INEC prayed the tribunal to dismiss the petition was that all the polling unit agents called as witnesses signed the result sheets and they could not distinguish between what they heard and what they saw.
“This is a clear indication that the election was conducted in compliance with the Electoral Act, 2022.
“The results were duly collated at all levels of collation.
“The petitioners have not pleaded any alternative results on the basis of which they can be declared as winners.
“The case of the petitioners is based on analysis undertaken by hired consultants,” he said.
He further held that the documents upon which the petitioners relied were all dumped on the tribunal and could not be used in their favour.
He therefore prayed the tribunal to dismiss the petition in its entirety as it had no merit.
On his part, counsel to Governor Monday Okpebholo, Mr Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN told the tribunal to dismiss the petition on the grounds that it had become an academic exercise.
He said that in the course of their research, they carefully extracted the polling units which the petitioners tendered documents on and compared them to the ones they presented and even at that, his client was well ahead of the petitioners in the polls.
On the contentious Form EC25b where the petitioners claimed the serial numbers of sensitive materials must be given, Ikpeazu said that all that was required for the form was quantity of electoral materials received and quantity returned.
He added that a pronouncement of the Supreme Court said that one could not prove over voting without the Bimodal Verification Authentication System (BVAs) Machines but that none of the machines was opened to allow the tribunal look at the content.
According to him, the petitioners by not tendering the right documents, failed to prove over voting on the whole.
Speaking on behalf of the All Progressives Congress, (APC) Mr Emmanuel Ukala argued that it was clear that the case of the petitioners was based virtually and entirely on non-compliance.
“By the nature of the case they pleaded, the Supreme Court has over the years laid down that they need to prove this by polling unit to polling unit, ward to ward and local government by local government.”
He, however, held that rather than prove this, the petitioners dumped documents on the court.
Arguing the case of the petitioners, Mr Ken Mozia, SAN, said that with 4519 polling units in Edo, the complaint in the petition was concerning 765 of them.
According to him, it is law that successful prosecution of election petition is not about the percentage of the total polling units in the state but the effect of the successive establishment of the complaint.
He further argued that the petition must be considered whollistically and not in parts.
“So the submission of isolating grounds and labeling them alone as academic is not well founded,” he said.
On the issue of not presenting the tribunal with an alternative result, the senior lawyer said that it was on record that all the results before the tribunal were tendered by his client.
On why the petitioners called only five polling unit agents, he said that the grouse of his client was with what happened at the collation centres and not at the polling units so they didn’t need more than five agents to testify.
“We concede that elections took place at the polling units but how 25 votes metamorphosed to 525 votes at the collation center is what we are quarrelling with,” he said.
Speaking on the claim that they dumped documents on the tribunal, Moze said that all the documents they tendered were duly certified by INEC and were tendered without objection from the commission, the makers of the document.
He also held that the tribunal had requisite jurisdiction to hear the petition because their allegations were not pre-election matters.
Law & Crime
Ibrahim Files ₦50 Billion Defamation Suit Against Punch, Columnist Over UN Appointment Critique
A major legal battle is unfolding in Nigeria’s media and political landscape after Senator Jimoh Ibrahim filed a ₦50 billion defamation suit against Punch Newspapers and veteran columnist Sonala Olumhense over a sharply critical opinion article questioning his suitability for diplomatic office. The lawsuit follows the publication on March 15, 2026 of Olumhense’s column titled “Jimoh Ibrahim, in broad daylight,” which examined the senator’s record shortly after his appointment as Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
The column, written in Olumhense’s characteristic accountability style, revisited a series of controversies surrounding Ibrahim’s business career, arguing that such matters were of legitimate public interest given the international scrutiny attached to Nigeria’s UN representation. Among the issues highlighted were the acquisition and eventual collapse of ventures such as NICON Airways and Air Nigeria, with references to longstanding allegations that employees of the former were left without salaries and pensions for years despite court awards. The article also mentioned disputes linked to NICON Insurance and raised questions about Ibrahim’s broader financial dealings.
Olumhense’s piece further referenced regulatory and financial controversies that have trailed the senator over the years, including the 2020 seizure of multiple properties by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria over a reported ₦69.4 billion debt. It also cited past investigations by agencies such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Federal Inland Revenue Service, including allegations relating to tax obligations and documentation issues. The columnist framed the discussion as a necessary review of publicly documented matters, arguing that diplomats posted to the United Nations inevitably face scrutiny from international media and policy observers.
However, Ibrahim’s legal team, led by prominent advocate Adeniyi Akintola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, has strongly rejected the article’s characterisation of the senator’s record. According to the lawyers, the column contains what they describe as deliberate distortions of court rulings and a misleading presentation of legal disputes that the senator claims to have successfully defended in court. They point in particular to Supreme Court judgments and a high-profile case involving Union Bank of Nigeria, where Ibrahim has previously stated that the courts awarded him a judgment exceeding ₦400 billion.
The legal action, which is expected to be formally filed beginning March 16, seeks ₦50 billion in damages for reputational harm and what Ibrahim’s lawyers describe as a coordinated smear campaign intended to undermine his credibility as a public official. Early reports of the impending suit were circulated by regional platform Ondo Events, though major national outlets had yet to provide extensive coverage at the time the news began spreading. As of Monday, Punch had not issued an official response to the legal threat.
The dispute places at the centre a familiar tension in Nigeria’s public life: the balance between the right of public officials to defend their reputation and the media’s role in scrutinising those who hold or seek positions of national representation. With Ibrahim preparing to take up a highly visible diplomatic role, the outcome of the case could become an important test of the boundaries between defamation law and press freedom in Nigeria’s evolving democratic landscape.
©️The Insight Lens Project.
Law & Crime
Late Richard Ekpebu: George Idumange, four other suspected killers of Estate Agent arraigned, remanded in prison till April 14th
By David Owei, Bayelsa
George Idumange popularly known as Pastor Brandy, the key suspect in the murder of the 42 years old Bayelsà State Estate Agent, Richard Ekpebu and four others were yesterday arraigned before the State High Court on twelves counts charges of conspiracy for murder, Murder, illegal possession of firearms, armed robbery and destroying of evidence among others.
Also arraigned along with George Idumange, were his girlfriend, Miss Victory Bernard, 23; a personnel with the Okaka Medium Correctional Centre with the rank of ASP equivalent, Ekiamene Amaoniye, aka Cash Money; Ibo Imaremi Gold, alias Police, 34; and Henry Igwe, 35.
After the charges in the suit numbered BYHC/YHC/CR/19/2026, were read to the accused, they all pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
The presiding Judge, Justice Raphael Ajuwa, after listening to the arguments of the Prosecuting Counsel on behalf of the State and the DPP, E.J.Peterside Esq and the Defence Counsel, M.Y.Benabo Esq (for 1st&4th accused), Azi Ovana Esq (2nd accused) and Wariebi Igberikubo Esq (5th accused) and Okunade Esq, he granted the application of the state that the suspects be remanded at the Okaka Medium Correctional Center pending trial.
Also the sister to the key suspect, identified as Queen Felix , who is the 6th accused, was however not in court.
The Directorate of Public Prosecution (DPP) headed by Peretimi Judith Peterside Esq told the court the 6th accused was initially granted administrative bail from her sick bed.
” She was very sick. And she is still not available and the shorty is not available too. She is not actually charged with murder but forgery.she can be charged separately.”
Justice Ajuwa however adjourned the case to April 14,15 and 16th after assurances from the State Prosecuting team that they have a total of twenty witnesses and are ready to present them in court in batches of three per session.
Late Richard Ekpebu, a known Estate Agent, was murdered in cold blood over a land sales deal and his body dumped in a bush along the New Otuoke Road near Bayelsa Palm on July 24, 2025.
The police tactical team of the Operation Puff Adder led by CSP Chris Nwaogbo, following a thorough investigation in Lagos, Port Harcourt and Yenagoa, arrested five suspects over the killing.
Law & Crime
Group Clarifies EFCC Petition Withdrawal in Controversy Involving VeryDarkMan, Ifeanyi Udezue
BY Abdul-Ganiyy Akanbi
The Igbo Community Assembly Abuja has called for responsible public discourse and adherence to due for the process following a viral social media video that raised allegations about a business transaction involving one of its leaders.
During a press conference in Abuja, the Chairman, Chief Ositadimma Nwoye, the Assembly emphasised the need for Nigerians to avoid spreading unverified information that could harm reputations and create unnecessary tension in society.
The group said it was reacting to a viral video in which Mr. Ifeanyi Udezue made claims through social media activist, Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, regarding a business transaction involving Chief Austin Oguejiofor.
According to the Assembly, Chief Austin Oguejiofor, also known as Onwa Enugwu-Ukwu, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First Rotech Group and has built a reputation in the real estate sector spanning more than three decades.
The group noted that the businessman has also supported several organisations and initiatives, serving as Grand Patron of Ohanaeze Youth Worldwide, Grand Patron of Anambra State Association Europe, Grand Patron of Anambra State Association Turkey, and Grand Patron of the Radio Television Theatre and Arts Workers Union of Nigeria.
It also expressed concern over the manner in which respected Igbo elder and business leader Arthur Eze was referenced in the viral content.
“Respected leaders within our community deserve to be addressed with the decorum and dignity befitting their status,” the group said.
It further noted that issues relating to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission were mentioned in the viral video but clarified that available documentation shows the petition earlier submitted to the commission had been withdrawn.
“Available information and documentation indicate that the petition earlier submitted to the EFCC was subsequently withdrawn… which contradicts the narrative suggesting compromise by the anti-graft agency,” the Assembly stated.
According to the group, documents such as registration records from the Corporate Affairs Commission and legal search reports relating to the business transaction also exist and provide additional context to the matter currently being discussed publicly.
It also referenced claims in the video that the content creator had held discussions with High Chief Oguejiofor, urging that the outcome of such interactions be presented in full to ensure fairness and balanced public understanding.
Calling for restraint, the group urged all parties to resolve disputes through lawful channels.
“Where disagreements arise from business transactions, the most appropriate avenue for resolution remains a court of competent jurisdiction or other legally recognised dispute-resolution mechanisms,” he added.
The Assembly further appealed to social media commentators to exercise caution and due diligence when discussing sensitive matters involving individuals and community institutions.
It reaffirmed commitment to protecting the integrity of its members while promoting fairness, accountability, and respect for the rule of law.
-
Politics10 months agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Politics7 months agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy7 months agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Entertainment2 years agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
-
Law & Crime9 months agoICPC pledges to collaborate with FIDA to end Sex for Marks in tertiary institutions
-
Law & Crime8 months agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
