Politics
Uphold rule of law in Nnamdi Kanu’s travails, lawyer tells judiciary
An Abuja-based legal practitioner, Onyedikachi Ifedi has again canvassed for upholding of the principle of natural justice and rule of law in the trial of the Biafra nation agitator, Nnamdi Kanu on terrorism charges by the federal government.
The lawyer insisted that the Supreme Court’s judgment of December 15, 2023 being used to prosecute Kanu is a catastrophic failure of judicial duty.
In a statement issued on Saturday, the lawyer pleaded with the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA; Senior Advocates of Nigeria, civil rights groups and the media to point out the grave dangers in the apex court’s judgment with a view to getting it reversed.
His grouse was that the Supreme Court verdict validated breach of international laws, including African Charters on human and people rights as well as setting a bad precedent for the nation.
The statement reads in part: “The case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has become the ultimate test for Nigeria’s commitment, or lack of, to the Rule of Law and obedience to its Constitution.
“The Supreme Court’s judgment of December 15, 2023, which condoned the Federal Government’s kidnapping of Mazi Kanu from Kenya and allowed his trial to proceed, represents a dangerous departure from precedent and rule of law to the rule of judicial tyranny.
“The Supreme Court judgment is a legal nullity—per incuriam (rendered in ignorance of binding law)—and therefore worthless.
“It sought to reduce the Constitution’s most sacred guarantees to mere suggestions. This is not about Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s guilt or innocence; it is about whether the Supreme Court is allowed to use their position as the apex court to destroy the foundational law of Nigeria- which is the Constitution, for the sake of one man.
“The government and some legal commentators have falsely framed the issue of Kanu’s kidnapping in Kenya and illegal rendition as a “technicality.”
“This is a profound misrepresentation. The principle of nullity is the law’s strongest tool to punish state impunity and protect every citizen from tyranny.
“What is Nullity? It is a legal declaration that a proceeding is void from the very beginning. It is not a minor procedural slip; it is the consequence of a breach so fundamental that it robs the entire process of its legitimacy.
“Why Does it Apply Here? The government did not simply arrest Nnamdi Kanu illegally within Nigeria as it did in 2015. It orchestrated an international crime, an extraordinary rendition, involving torture, denial of fair hearing, access to lawyers, and a complete bypass of all extradition treaties and Kenyan courts.
“You cannot build a legitimate trial on such an illegitimate foundation. The doctrine of the “fruit of the poisonous tree” comes into play.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to allow the trial to continue ignored decades of its own binding rulings. This is the definition of a per incuriam judgment.
“In Ariori vs. Elemo (1983): The Supreme Court itself held that “any breach of the rules of natural justice renders the whole proceeding a nullity.” The rendition was a gross breach of natural justice before the trial even began.
“Also, in Adigun vs. A.G. Oyo State (1987): The Court ruled that violating fair hearing is a “fundamental vice” that nullifies everything that follows.
“The Constitution of Nigeria (S.36) & The African Charter (Arts. 6 & 7): These documents guarantee the right to fair hearing and due process. These rights are non-derogable—meaning they can never be suspended, not even in times of war. The government violated them. The Court’s role is to enforce them, not overlook them.
“By choosing to treat this foundational violation as a mere “irregularity,” the Supreme Court made a grave error that threatens the legal protections of every single person in Nigeria.
“The recent landmark judgment from the High Court of Kenya (June 24, 2025) is not just a “new fact”; it is a powerful, independent judicial confirmation of the Nigerian Court of Appeal’s 2022 ruling. Both a Nigerian court and a Kenyan court have now found the same facts.
“The Nigerian government has been found guilty of international law violations by a foreign court. For the Nigerian judiciary to now say that a trial founded on these crimes can still be “fair” is a catastrophic failure of justice and makes a mockery of our nation’s standing in the international community.
“If this judgment stands, it sets a terrifying precedent: The State can Kidnap anyone: Any citizen critical of the government could be abducted from any country, without any legal process, and brought to Nigeria to face trial. Your passport and foreign travel will not protect you.
“The government’s argument that its illegal acts can be “cured” by a fair trial or compensated with damages means that fundamental rights have a price tag. The state can violate your most sacred rights and simply pay a fine afterwards. This commercializes justice and destroys its very essence.
“When the highest court in the land fails to draw a bright line against state-sponsored criminality, it signals that the executive branch is above the law. This erodes the very foundation of our democracy.
“The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), senior advocates, and human rights lawyers must add their voices to condemn this judgment and support the legal steps to have it reviewed and set aside. The integrity of the entire legal system is at stake.
“The media and civil rights groups must rise to educate the public on the grave implications of this case. This is not about sympathy for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu; it is about defending the Constitution that protects us all.
“The International Community must take note of this breach of international law and its ratification by the Nigerian judiciary. Peer review and diplomatic pressure are crucial to upholding global human rights standards.
“The path to justice is clear. The Supreme Court must review and overturn its own decision. The proceedings against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu must be declared a nullity, and he must be released.
“This is the only outcome that upholds the Constitution, respects international law, and sends an unequivocal message that in Nigeria, the rule of law is supreme—not the whims of the state.
“This is our stand. For the sake of every Nigerian, we must defend the law.”
Politics
APC withdraws petition challenging Gov.Adeleke’s Victory
By Our Correspondent
In dramatic twice the All Progressives Congress (APC) has filed an application seeking to withdraw the petition challenging the victory of Governor Ademola Adeleke.
The withdrawal came amid conflicting positions within the party’s legal team over whether the
APC had authorised the petition challenging the outcome of the August 15 governorship election.
Daily Champion reports that the APC, and the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, challenged the outcome of the August 15, 2026, Osun Gubernatorial elections.
The APC’s petition, marked EPT/OS/GOV/01/2026, which was filed by its governorship candidate, Bola Oyebamiji, listed Adeleke, the Accord, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, as respondents in the petition challenging the election outcome.
Meanwhile, a Notice of Motion to Withdraw Petition dated September 8, 2026, filed by a counsel for APC, Barrister Oluseyi Oyagbile, before the Osun State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, indicated the petitioners’ decision to discontinue the case.
The document seeks an order of the tribunal permitting the petitioners to withdraw the election petition.
However, an APC legal team led by Abiodun Layonu, SAN, had earlier disowned the petition, insisting that the party and its candidate had decided not to challenge Adeleke’s victory at the tribunal.
Also, the APC campaign council distanced itself from reports claiming that its governorship candidate, Oyebamiji (AMBO), filed a petition challenging the outcome of the August 15, 2026 governorship election at the Election Petition Tribunal.
A statement made available by the campaign spokesperson, said, “We state categorically that neither the All Progressives Congress ( APC) nor its governorship candidate, Asiwaju Munirudeen Bola Oyebamiji (AMBO) filed any petition at the tribunal challenging the outcome of the August 15 governorship election.
“The purported claim is therefore completely untrue and should be regarded as nothing more than a rumour being circulated by individuals seeking to mislead members of the public and create unnecessary tension.
“We urge members of the public, supporters of our great party and the media to discountenance the claim and refrain from giving credibility to unverified information designed to cause confusion.
“The APC and Asiwaju Munirudeen Bola Oyebamiji remain committed to lawful and democratic processes and will continue to act responsibly in the interest of peace, stability and the good people of Osun State.
“We urge the public to rely only on official statements from the APC and the Campaign Council on matters concerning the party, its candidate and the outcome of the August 15 governorship election.”
Politics
APC chieftain demands probe, prosecution of Atiku over $40M, SIEMENS, SPV allegations
By Our Correspondent
A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Ntufam Hilliard Eta, has called on the nation’s anti-corruption agencies to fully investigate allegations and petitions against former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and prosecute him if evidence establishes any criminal offence.
Addressing journalists in Abuja on Tuesday at the APC National Secretariat, Eta said the call was driven by the principle of accountability, not political considerations.
He stressed that public office must never become a shield against scrutiny and that political ambition should not stop institutions from acting on credible allegations.
The APC chieftain said he was not asking for a conviction in the court of public opinion, but that the evidence be subjected to the process of court of law. “That distinction is fundamental,” he stated.
Eta referenced a petition reportedly received by the EFCC on September 1, 2026, calling for the reopening of financial-crime allegations against Atiku dating back to investigations conducted around 2005-2006.
He also cited renewed discussions around a 2010 United States Senate report on suspicious financial transactions.
Eta noted that while the report was not a criminal conviction, the allegations contained in it were serious enough to warrant examination by Nigerian authorities.
According to him, the first set of allegations concern the movement of more than US$40 million in suspect funds into the United States between 2000 and 2008 through offshore corporations linked to Jennifer Douglas, Atiku’s wife. The Senate report said about US$25 million was transferred into U.S. accounts opened by Douglas.
The second allegation concerns payments connected to Siemens AG. Eta said the Senate report stated that Douglas received at least US$1.7 million in alleged bribe payments, while an SEC civil complaint alleged US$2.8 million in bribe payments from Siemens.
He stressed that these were allegations contained in historical records, not convictions.
Third, Eta mentioned questions over approximately US$14 million transferred by offshore corporations to American University for consulting services related to the university’s establishment in Nigeria, as examined in the Senate report.
He also listed allegations of the use of Special Purpose Vehicles, SPVs, to divert public funds during Atiku’s tenure as Vice-President from 1999 to 2007. These resurfaced in 2023 following claims by Michael Achimugu and a petition by Festus Keyamo to the EFCC, ICPC and CCB.
Other allegations, he said, border on money laundering, criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation, conspiracy and possible violations of the Code of Conduct, as well as questions concerning accounts associated with Marine Float and other companies.
Eta argued that allowing allegations of this magnitude to become mere political ammunition during an election season is dangerous and he said the same standard of accountability must apply to government and opposition figures alike.
He therefore called on the EFCC and other competent authorities to examine every credible petition, obtain relevant records, invite appropriate persons and “follow the money” without fear or favour.
“A serious democracy asks: Was a crime committed? Is there admissible evidence? If yes, prosecution should follow. If no, the matter should be closed,” Eta said, adding, “No sacred cows. No political immunity. No selective justice. Just evidence, due process and the law.”
Politics
Nigerian Politics Becoming Less Violent, Says Gov Diri As CBM Holds Bayelsa Retreat
By David Owei
Governor of Bayelsa State, Senator Douye Diri, has observed that the political arena in Nigeria was shifting from violence and intimidation to knowledge-based politics.
Speaking during the State Working Committee Retreat of the City Boy Movement (CBM) in Yenagoa, Governor Diri lauded the socio-political group for leading the paradigm shift, insisting that politics should never be about violence.
He noted that while the CBM had been vocal about the re-election of President Bola Tinubu in next year’s election, he urged its members to work with the structures of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the state and at the national level.
The Bayelsa governor described the movement as strategic and advised it to go beyond social media advocacy to grassroots mobilisation.
Explaining why he pitched tents with the APC, Diri recalled how President Tinubu supported the state’s development by approving the construction of the second phase of the Nembe-Brass road and that he also granted waivers for the state’s imported gas turbines, stressing that the President deserved the support of the people of Bayelsa.
He also restated his position on a restructured Nigeria, saying democracy thrives only when there was justice and fairness, and that given his antecedence, Tinubu was the right man to restructure Nigeria.
His words: “The use of guns and intimidation is giving way to knowledge-based electoral process and I commend the City Boy Movement for this. We are not animals and we do not need to be flogged before we move. I am happy that gradually our politics is changing for the better.
“All of the various support groups must know that the party structure is the number one structure and I am happy that the City Boy Movement is working with the party.
“In this state, APC is a no-go area. Our chances of winning the 2027 election is very high.
“This is one good thing I have seen that a youth group coming together to strategise for an election. We all want our President to come back but it wild not happen by chance. We all have to play our roles not just on social media but at the grassroots. It is our duty to go from door to door.
“President Tinubu has supported the development of Bayelsa State and deserves the support of the people. He responded swiftly to the request for the second phase of the Nembe-Brass road and also gave us waivers for the gas turbines.
“I am an advocate of restructuring and President Tinubu is doing things that people had not succeeded in doing such as state policing. For us in Bayelsa, we want to control our resources and pay tax to the centre and I believe that if we must acheive that, this President is one we must follow. We have seen a President who is stable and capable. Let us allow him to complete his second term.”
In his remarks, Bayelsa State APC chairman, Hon. Warman Ogoriba, thanked Governor Diri for his support to the party, saying the APC decided to be strategic rather than joining issues with people or other parties.
Ogoriba said the APC parades the best candidates and that the party will mobilise to ensure victory for them in the 2027 elections.
In a welcome address, Bayelsa State Director of the City Boy Movement, High Chief Osomkime Blankson, said the retreat was to strategise for the re-election of President Tinubu as he deserved a second term by reason of his performance and achievements.
He expressed appreciation to the governor for his supportive leadership and commitment to peace and development of the state.
Also, the Director-General of the City Boy Movement, Mr. Francis Shoga, described Tinubu as a courageous leader who has taken painful but beneficial decisions and that the movement would take the achievements of his administration to the grassroots.
He thanked the people of Bayelsa for their support, expressing optimism that the state would contribute significantly to the potential 10 million youth votes of the movement for Tinubu.
-
Politics1 year agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Politics1 year agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy1 year agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Entertainment2 years agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
Sports7 months agoBayelsa-born ex-football star’s son, Opuama donates spike shoes to Athletics Association
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
Law & Crime1 year agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
