Politics
Uphold rule of law in Nnamdi Kanu’s travails, lawyer tells judiciary
An Abuja-based legal practitioner, Onyedikachi Ifedi has again canvassed for upholding of the principle of natural justice and rule of law in the trial of the Biafra nation agitator, Nnamdi Kanu on terrorism charges by the federal government.
The lawyer insisted that the Supreme Court’s judgment of December 15, 2023 being used to prosecute Kanu is a catastrophic failure of judicial duty.
In a statement issued on Saturday, the lawyer pleaded with the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA; Senior Advocates of Nigeria, civil rights groups and the media to point out the grave dangers in the apex court’s judgment with a view to getting it reversed.
His grouse was that the Supreme Court verdict validated breach of international laws, including African Charters on human and people rights as well as setting a bad precedent for the nation.
The statement reads in part: “The case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has become the ultimate test for Nigeria’s commitment, or lack of, to the Rule of Law and obedience to its Constitution.
“The Supreme Court’s judgment of December 15, 2023, which condoned the Federal Government’s kidnapping of Mazi Kanu from Kenya and allowed his trial to proceed, represents a dangerous departure from precedent and rule of law to the rule of judicial tyranny.
“The Supreme Court judgment is a legal nullity—per incuriam (rendered in ignorance of binding law)—and therefore worthless.
“It sought to reduce the Constitution’s most sacred guarantees to mere suggestions. This is not about Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s guilt or innocence; it is about whether the Supreme Court is allowed to use their position as the apex court to destroy the foundational law of Nigeria- which is the Constitution, for the sake of one man.
“The government and some legal commentators have falsely framed the issue of Kanu’s kidnapping in Kenya and illegal rendition as a “technicality.”
“This is a profound misrepresentation. The principle of nullity is the law’s strongest tool to punish state impunity and protect every citizen from tyranny.
“What is Nullity? It is a legal declaration that a proceeding is void from the very beginning. It is not a minor procedural slip; it is the consequence of a breach so fundamental that it robs the entire process of its legitimacy.
“Why Does it Apply Here? The government did not simply arrest Nnamdi Kanu illegally within Nigeria as it did in 2015. It orchestrated an international crime, an extraordinary rendition, involving torture, denial of fair hearing, access to lawyers, and a complete bypass of all extradition treaties and Kenyan courts.
“You cannot build a legitimate trial on such an illegitimate foundation. The doctrine of the “fruit of the poisonous tree” comes into play.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to allow the trial to continue ignored decades of its own binding rulings. This is the definition of a per incuriam judgment.
“In Ariori vs. Elemo (1983): The Supreme Court itself held that “any breach of the rules of natural justice renders the whole proceeding a nullity.” The rendition was a gross breach of natural justice before the trial even began.
“Also, in Adigun vs. A.G. Oyo State (1987): The Court ruled that violating fair hearing is a “fundamental vice” that nullifies everything that follows.
“The Constitution of Nigeria (S.36) & The African Charter (Arts. 6 & 7): These documents guarantee the right to fair hearing and due process. These rights are non-derogable—meaning they can never be suspended, not even in times of war. The government violated them. The Court’s role is to enforce them, not overlook them.
“By choosing to treat this foundational violation as a mere “irregularity,” the Supreme Court made a grave error that threatens the legal protections of every single person in Nigeria.
“The recent landmark judgment from the High Court of Kenya (June 24, 2025) is not just a “new fact”; it is a powerful, independent judicial confirmation of the Nigerian Court of Appeal’s 2022 ruling. Both a Nigerian court and a Kenyan court have now found the same facts.
“The Nigerian government has been found guilty of international law violations by a foreign court. For the Nigerian judiciary to now say that a trial founded on these crimes can still be “fair” is a catastrophic failure of justice and makes a mockery of our nation’s standing in the international community.
“If this judgment stands, it sets a terrifying precedent: The State can Kidnap anyone: Any citizen critical of the government could be abducted from any country, without any legal process, and brought to Nigeria to face trial. Your passport and foreign travel will not protect you.
“The government’s argument that its illegal acts can be “cured” by a fair trial or compensated with damages means that fundamental rights have a price tag. The state can violate your most sacred rights and simply pay a fine afterwards. This commercializes justice and destroys its very essence.
“When the highest court in the land fails to draw a bright line against state-sponsored criminality, it signals that the executive branch is above the law. This erodes the very foundation of our democracy.
“The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), senior advocates, and human rights lawyers must add their voices to condemn this judgment and support the legal steps to have it reviewed and set aside. The integrity of the entire legal system is at stake.
“The media and civil rights groups must rise to educate the public on the grave implications of this case. This is not about sympathy for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu; it is about defending the Constitution that protects us all.
“The International Community must take note of this breach of international law and its ratification by the Nigerian judiciary. Peer review and diplomatic pressure are crucial to upholding global human rights standards.
“The path to justice is clear. The Supreme Court must review and overturn its own decision. The proceedings against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu must be declared a nullity, and he must be released.
“This is the only outcome that upholds the Constitution, respects international law, and sends an unequivocal message that in Nigeria, the rule of law is supreme—not the whims of the state.
“This is our stand. For the sake of every Nigerian, we must defend the law.”
Politics
ADC Demands Clarification on U.S.–Nigeria Health MoU Over Conflicting Framings, Constitutional Breach Concerns
By George Mgbeleke
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has called on the Federal Government to immediately clarify the contents of the recently signed health cooperation Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Nigeria and the United States, citing sharply conflicting public descriptions of the agreement by both governments. While Abuja has presented the MoU as a technical, inclusive framework to strengthen health security and expand primary healthcare, the ADC notes that official statements from the United States introduce identity-based framing that may be in breach of Nigeria’s constitutional provisions on non-discrimination, as well as discretionary termination powers that subordinate Nigeria’s interests and raise serious questions about national sovereignty.
The full statement read:
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) calls on the Federal Government to urgently clarify the contents and implications of the recently signed health cooperation Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Nigeria and the United States, following clearly conflicting public descriptions of the agreement issued by both governments.
While the Federal Government has presented the MoU as a technical and inclusive framework aimed at strengthening health security, expanding primary healthcare, and increasing domestic health financing, official statements released by the United States Embassy describe the same agreement in materially different terms. The U.S. characterisation introduces religious, identity-based framing, indicating that spending under the MoU should be targeted at health institutions backed by a particular religion only.
It is the ADC’s considered view that the Nigerian government should not enter into any agreement that is sectional or potentially inimical to Nigeria’s constitutional commitment to inclusion and national unity. We find it particularly curious that these troubling conditionalities, including those that grant the United States unilateral powers of termination, are conspicuously missing from the Federal Government’s public rendering of the agreement.
The ADC believes that this divergence is not a mere communications issue. Instead, it appears calculated to avoid public scrutiny, thereby raising fundamental questions about transparency, constitutional compliance, and Nigeria’s sovereignty. Nigerians are entitled to know which version of this agreement reflects the actual terms that were signed, and why such consequential differences exist between Abuja’s account and Washington’s.
The ADC affirms its support for foreign assistance and bilateral cooperation to strengthen Nigeria’s healthcare system, but insists that such partnerships must respect Nigeria’s diversity and must comply with our constitutional provisions prohibiting discrimination on the basis of religion or ethnicity.
For the avoidance of doubt, Section 42(1) states: “No citizen of Nigeria shall be discriminated against on the grounds of place of origin, sex, religion, or political opinion.” Similarly, Sections 15 and 17 impose a duty on the state to promote national integration, eliminate discrimination, and guarantee equality of rights and opportunities for all citizens.
Therefore, any international agreement, or public framing of such an agreement, that appears to introduce identity-based distinctions into the provision of public services raises serious constitutional and national cohesion concerns. We are particularly at a loss as to why the Nigerian Government would enter into such an agreement, especially considering that Nigeria is reportedly committing more resources under the arrangement.
The MoU states that the United States is expected to provide approximately two billion dollars in grant support over five years, while Nigeria has reportedly committed close to three billion dollars in domestic health financing over the same period. It is difficult to justify an arrangement in which Nigeria bears the larger financial burden, yet decisions regarding target beneficiaries and the discretion to pause or terminate cooperation appear to rest outside the country.
Healthcare is a core public good that must remain neutral, inclusive, and universally accessible. The injection of identity considerations into health financing or security-linked performance assessments risks politicising care delivery, undermining public trust, and exposing already vulnerable institutions and workers to avoidable tension and danger.
The ADC therefore calls on the Federal Government to come clean by publishing the full text of the signed MoU, including any annexes or accompanying instruments, and to clearly explain whether the identity-based and security-linked elements referenced by the United States form part of the agreement Nigeria actually signed or exist solely within foreign policy interpretations. Nigerians also deserve a clear explanation of how this agreement aligns with the Constitution and preserves Nigeria’s sovereign authority over its public policy choices.
Politics
2027: Seek God’s Direction, Diri Tells Bayelsa Politicians
Governor of Bayelsa State, Senator Douye Diri, has admonished politicians in the state to prayerfully make decisions ahead of the 2027 elections, noting that power comes from God.
Governor Diri also urged them to eschew politics of bitterness and violence.
Speaking in his hometown, Sampou, in Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area during the KOLGA Annual Day of Thanksgiving on Saturday, he advised people of the state not to allow politics to separate them.
Diri commended the KOLGA people for sustaining the annual event, noting that an attitude of appreciation attracts blessings.
He appreciated the other arms of government, the clergy, and people of the state for their support, urging them to be thankful to God at all times.
His words: “I thank God for a day like this that has been set aside legislatively to thank God. The more this local government area thanks God, the more it will be blessed.
“I call on other local government areas to emulate KOLGA because as governor, I want the blessings to spread across the state.
“This is a political year. Let our political class be reminded that power comes from God. Whatever position you desire, my admonition is go and pray; go and consult God. Use me as a point of contact.
“Let me also appreciate Apostle Zilly-Aggrey, the initiator of this event.
Whenever you recognise God, He never lets you down. That is why KOLGA and Bayelsa State will continue to grow from strength to strength because we always put God first.
“For us holding public offices, your service should be to the people. Do not be the only rich man in your community.
“Together we can acheive a lot. Let the bitterness and hatred be removed. If your brother is succeeding, support him. Let us open our hearts and love one another.”
In his welcome remarks, the KOLGA Chairman, Tariye Lelei, stated that people of the area were thankful to God for the achievements recorded.
He noted that the local government had become more accessible by road unlike in the past when most of the communities could only be reached by water.
In a sermorn, Presiding Overseer of the Royal House of Grace International Church, Apostle David Zilly-Aggrey, said KOLGA was blessed to have a governor that has transformed the local government and the state at large.
The renowned cleric hailed the state assembly and members of the state executive council for supporting the governor, saying development was a collective responsibility.
Present at the programme were the wives of the governor, Dr. Gloria and Justice Patience, leader of the Bayelsa State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Monday Bubou, and other state legislators, Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Nimibofa Ayawei, and members of the state executive council.
Others were the State Chairman, Caretaker Committee of the All Progressives Congress, Barr. Dennis Otiotio, Executive Director, Social and Human Capital Development, South-South Development Commission, Engr. Preye Aganaba, local government chairmen as well as the Chairman, Bayelsa State Council of Traditional Rulers and Ibenanaowei of Ekpetiama Kingdom, King Bubaraye Dakolo, King of Kolokuma Clan, HRM Onya Mozi Agara, other traditional rulers and top government officials.
Politics
INC Polls: Ogoriba Promises To Defend Interest of Ijaw Nation …..Picks Presidential Forms
By Owei David,Yenagoa
Elder T .K Ogoriba , a Human Rights Activist and founding father of the Movement for the survival of the Ijaw ethnic nationality of the Niger Delta(MOSIEND), Elder Timi Kaiser-Wilhelm Ogoriba has said he would continue to advocate for the environmental and human rights of the people of the Niger Delta, especially his Ijaw kinsmen.
Ogoriba who doubles as the current Vice-Chairman of the Bayelsa State founding fathers forum made the pledge at the Ijaw House, headquarters of the Ijaw National Congress (INC), in Yenagoa, capital of the State, while fielding questions from newsmen shortly after picking his interest form for the position of president in the 2026 polls of the national executive council of the body.
The Odi-born activist who described the foremost Pan-Ijaw umbrella parent body as the envy of many sister ethnic groups in the nation, noted that he played pivotal roles in the formative stages of both the INC and its youth body, the Ijaw Youth Council (IYC).
He expressed confidence in the activities of the body, saying he would continue to work with all relevant stakeholders to reposition the Pan-Ijaw group for greater achievements when elected as president come February, 2026.
“I’m still ready to go to trenches because of Ijaw nation. For those who knew me before now, you’ll recall that I have gone to trenches several times because of my love for the Ijaw people.
“Today as an ethnic group, we’re the envy of every other tribe. And that’s because we’ve all it takes for others to envy us. Today the INC has become the pride of everyone, including many who don’t know how we started it. And I’m not detered by the propaganda against my candidacy. I’m determined to win and continue my service to the Ijaw nation.
“I was part of the struggle in 1991 when the INC was formed in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. I’ve all it takes to lead the INC as president. But the INC under my leadership will not be a ‘T. K. Ogoriba thing alone’. I’ll need all of you and every Son and daughter of Ijaw nation to lead us well when elected”, he said.
The Presidential hopeful who also bared his mind on issues of Resource control and true-federalism restated his commitment towards ensuring that the Niger Delta region was given fair treatment by Government.
He stressed the need for the INC to synergize with other ethnic nationalities of the Niger Delta region for positive results, saying he would also ensure that there is mutual respect and understanding amongst and between stakeholders of the Ijaw nation and other sister ethnic groups to fast track the processes of growth and development of the region.
Our correspondent reported that he came to pick presidential form amid wild jubilation by a tumultuous and unprecedented crowd of supporters and stakeholders.
-
Politics5 months agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy5 months agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Politics8 months agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Entertainment1 year agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
-
Law & Crime7 months agoICPC pledges to collaborate with FIDA to end Sex for Marks in tertiary institutions
-
Law & Crime6 months agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
