Connect with us

Uncategorized

Ethics and the Indiscretion of AI

Published

on

By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko

What Is Ethics?

To begin this reflection, the best way to proceed is to first understand the philosophical concept of ethics, which is generally defined as the set of moral principles that helps each of us determine what is right or wrong in our actions.

Furthermore, ethics, according to moral philosophers, serves as what can commonly be described as our individual moral handbook—a framework that guides us on how to treat others and make decisions in our daily lives.

For the avoidance of doubt, ethics, as the moral governor of our actions as human beings, comprises the principles that help determine whether we are being truthful, choosing fairness over selfishness, and acting justly. Ethics therefore shapes the kind of person each of us ultimately becomes, as judged by our actions.

Whether you realise it or not, ethics quietly guides our actions and influences how we treat others. From small choices, such as returning extra change, to major decisions, such as standing up for what is right, ethics is always at work behind the scenes.

This writer has gone to some length to define ethics because those moral principles have become particularly relevant at a time when members of the human race are discussing the future of humanity in an era in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the fastest-growing areas of scientific and technological development.

We will consider some of the approaches that have been offered to the scientific community concerning the responsible development of AI, including perspectives attributed to the Holy Father, Pope Leo XIV, and one of the world’s most prominent monarchs, King Charles III of the United Kingdom.

Since succeeding the late Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ on Earth, Pope Leo XIV has articulated guidelines on how humanity should approach and regulate the development of Artificial Intelligence. His theological, scholarly and philosophical reflections have included discussions about how ethical principles should guide technological advancement and protect human dignity.

According to Vatican News, the Pope has emphasised the importance of ensuring that technological progress remains directed towards the common good of humanity. His reflections raise fundamental questions about whether scientific inventions should merely advance human capabilities or whether they must also be governed by moral principles that protect human dignity, social justice and the natural environment.

‘Gravely Immoral’ to Subjugate a Nation

Pope Leo XIV, in his reflections on Catholic social teaching, identified principles concerning the common good and the dignity of every human person.

The common good can be understood as the social expression of the dignity recognised in every person. The Pope has also emphasised the importance of respecting the right of peoples to exist, preserve their identities and contribute their unique qualities to the family of nations.

From this perspective, any attempt to eliminate or subjugate a nation raises profound moral questions and conflicts with the principles of human dignity and the common good.

Technology Must Not Be in the Hands of a Few

The Pope has also emphasised the importance of the universal destination of goods. In this context, he has highlighted the need to ensure that technological advancement does not become concentrated in the hands of a small number of individuals or corporations, thereby widening the gap between those included in the digital revolution and those excluded from it.

The principle of subsidiarity similarly requires societies to avoid excessive centralisation and paternalistic approaches to social life, while encouraging shared responsibility.

Solidarity, another important principle of Catholic social teaching, is both a principle and a virtue. It challenges indifference and requires societies to consider not only those living today but also future generations.

Closely following the broader ethical questions surrounding technological advancement, King Charles III of the United Kingdom has also expressed concern about the potential dangers of Artificial Intelligence if the technology falls into the wrong hands.

The King warned AI executives about the “existential dangers” posed by the technology being misused.

He made the comments at a summit convened at Dumfries House in Ayrshire to discuss how technology can be used to benefit society.

Those gathered at the meeting reportedly included Kanishka Narayan, the UK’s AI Minister, the Pope’s adviser, and representatives from major AI companies such as Nvidia, OpenAI and Anthropic.

The King’s intervention came amid a series of warnings from people within the technology industry about the rapidly evolving capabilities of advanced, or “frontier”, AI models and the need for regulation to ensure that such technologies remain under appropriate safeguards.

“Those who have created these technologies are now increasingly warning that AI risks developing darker capacities—perhaps even to take life,” the King told executives.

He said there appeared to be an “urgency” in adequately considering the existential dangers of such technologies falling into the wrong hands and being used in potentially catastrophic ways.

“The task before you is not merely to advance technology, but to ensure that it remains firmly in the service of humanity, community and the natural world,” he told the gathering.

The summit was convened to consider whether a “shared set of principles” could be developed to help guide the future application of AI.

‘Keep Engineering’

Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, was among the leading technology executives attending the summit.

Nvidia is a major player in AI infrastructure, supplying chips to leading AI developers, including OpenAI and Meta.

Huang told the gathering that he believed safety was “paramount”, adding that companies should hold back a product and “keep engineering” if it was not sufficiently safe.

The Nvidia chief executive also highlighted the potential value of open models—systems that give users direct access to the underlying technology—as a way of ensuring that people and countries are not left behind.

He said such systems must also be protected so that “researchers, universities, start-ups and countries” can develop applications that “none of us would have imagined alone”.

“Let us lead with responsible optimism, build AI safely and securely, open it to more people, expand our ambition and solve the problems that matter to the world,” Huang said.

Meanwhile, Sir Demis Hassabis, co-founder of the British AI research laboratory DeepMind, which was later acquired by Google, offered a more cautious assessment of the pace of technological development.

He said artificial general intelligence—systems that could potentially equal or surpass humans across multiple tasks—could be only a few years away and could have an impact many times greater than that of the Industrial Revolution.

A Wave of Warnings

If you think you have heard the most alarming warnings about the unbridled and insufficiently regulated evolution of Artificial Intelligence, then the debate is far from over.

Sir Demis Hassabis acknowledged that the chance of something going wrong was “definitely non-zero”. However, he advocated what he described as “a sensible middle way”, arguing that humanity could address the risks if collectively given the space and time necessary to mitigate them.

“The future is not yet written,” he told the King’s delegates.

Sarah Friar, OpenAI’s chief financial officer, said AI had the potential to solve some of society’s “hardest problems”, but acknowledged that its growing capabilities raised questions about safety and how to ensure that the technology always serves people.

“We need to address those questions together,” she said, adding that no single company or government could address them alone.

The wider debate over AI has intensified, with discussions about its potential power, social consequences and regulation increasingly dominating public discourse, technology forums and social media.

However, some critical observers have argued that the focus on hypothetical future risks could distract attention from more immediate concerns surrounding AI, including its environmental impact, energy consumption, employment consequences, privacy implications and potential use in surveillance and misinformation.

The BBC has reported on concerns among people working in the field about the speed of technological advancement and what it could mean for humanity.

Anthropic scientist Evan Hubinger has also expressed concerns about the possibility of human extinction resulting from AI, assigning a significant probability to such an outcome in his personal assessment.

AI industry leaders have similarly weighed in on the debate. OpenAI’s Sam Altman has acknowledged that people are right to be concerned about AI risks while arguing that AI companies must work to ensure that the technology is developed safely.

Ironically, critics argue that AI companies cannot simply be relied upon to regulate themselves.

Some political figures and technology critics have therefore called for stronger government oversight, while others have dismissed some AI safety concerns as exaggerated.

The central question, however, remains the same: how can humanity encourage technological innovation while ensuring that innovation does not undermine human dignity, safety and the common good?

The Moral Responsibility of AI Development

To be on the safe side, there is an immediate necessity for the advancement of AI to be adequately regulated, bearing in mind the critical need to safeguard humanity.

The concerns raised by religious leaders, political figures, scientists and technology executives demonstrate that AI is no longer merely a question of technological innovation. It is increasingly a question of ethics.

Artificial Intelligence should therefore be developed within common ethical frameworks that emphasise the common good of humanity. Its development should not become a race driven exclusively by commercial interests among technology companies.

The fundamental question should be whether AI ultimately serves humanity or whether humanity becomes increasingly subordinate to the technological systems it creates.

Technology must remain a servant of humanity and not become its master.

The ethical responsibility of our generation is therefore to ensure that scientific advancement is accompanied by moral responsibility. The extraordinary power of Artificial Intelligence requires extraordinary responsibility from those who design it, regulate it, finance it and deploy it.

The future of AI should not be determined solely by what technology makes possible. It should also be determined by what humanity considers morally acceptable.

Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko is the founder of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria and a former National Commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

UNN Confirms Death of Four Graduates at An Off-Campus Party

Published

on

By

Professor Simon Ortuanya,

By John Nwafor

The management of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), has declared a three-day mourning period following the tragic death of four fresh graduates who reportedly died after attending an off-campus house party in Nsukka, Enugu State.

The Vice-Chancellor, Professor Simon Ortuanya, disclosed this while addressing journalists on the incident, which occurred on November 11, 2026, explaining that 10 students of the university attended the gathering organised to celebrate one of their friends who had completed his final-year examination.

According to the Vice-Chancellor, four of the students died after allegedly consuming substances suspected to be alcohol and drugs, while the remaining six are currently receiving medical treatment at different hospitals.

Describing the incident as “a death too many”, Ortuanya announced that all social and academic activities would be suspended across the university during the three-day mourning period.

“Within these three days, all social and academic activities will be suspended in the University,” he said.

He also announced the suspension of a town hall meeting earlier scheduled between the university community and the Governor of Enugu State.

The Vice-Chancellor extended the university management’s condolences to the families, friends and colleagues of the deceased, assuring them of the institution’s solidarity in their moment of grief.

“The Management, staff and the students of the University of Nigeria share in their grief at this difficult moment and pray for the repose of the souls of the departed,” Ortuanya said.

He also clarified that the students involved in the incident came from different departments, dismissing reports suggesting that all the victims were from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Reiterating the university’s ban on all forms of sign-out celebrations, the Vice-Chancellor urged students to avoid activities that could put their lives at risk.

He further disclosed that the university was cooperating with security agencies to establish the actual circumstances surrounding the deaths.

The tragedy has renewed concerns over students’ safety and the risks associated with substance use at social gatherings, as investigations continue to determine the precise cause of the deaths.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Fubaa: Rivers Caoable of deliverying znassive Votes fir Tinubu,Chinda, Others Charges APC, Rainbow Coalition to embrace team work

Published

on

By

L-R: Governor of Rivers State, His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara (left) in a tet-a-tet with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory,Chief Nyesom Ezenwo Wike at the inauguration of the APC Presidential Campaign Council in Port Harcourt on Thursday.

By George Mgbeleke

Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, has declared that the State is capable of delivering massive votes for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) Governorship Candidate, Rt Hon Kingsley Chinda and other candidates of the Rainbow Coalition in the forthcoming general elections.

Fubara who stated this on Thursday at the inauguration of the APC Presidential Campaign Council in Port Harcourt, said the surest path to victory is for the members of the Presidential Campaign Council drawn from the APC and the Rainbow Coalition to embrace the spirit of teamwork..

Governor Fubara said what the state was witnessing in the current political season is a repeat of the successful mobilization done in 2022 and 2023, when a large campaign council worked in unity to deliver victory for him and for President Tinubu, adding that the present council is bigger, wider and better coordinated and should therefore achieve even better results.

He noted that the beauty of the new council is the fact that some persons who were in the opposition camp during the previous elections are now part of the team, noting that their inclusion has made the task easier, provided everyone works as one team and with sincerity of purpose.

The Governor thanked the Coordinator of the Presidential Campaign Council for Rivers State, Chief Nyesom Ezenwo Wike and other leaders who worked tirelessly to bring the council to fruition, stressing that nothing is impossible especially when people work together for a common purpose. He expressed optimism that with seriousness and commitment, the state would record a higher number of votes than it recorded in 2023.

Governor Fubara, while congratulating members who made the list, appealed to those whose names were omitted not to be discouraged, as there are still sub-committees to be constituted and the list can still be updated, even as he warned against double loyalty.

He said the state has gone past the stage of division and is now looking to the future and what God holds for Rivers people, expressing confidence that with the strategy already put in place, the APC and the Rainbow Coalition would come out victorious in 2027.

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory and Coordinator of the Bola Ahmed Tinubu Presidential Campaign Council for Rivers State and the FCT, Chief Nyesom Ezenwo Wike, while inaugurating the Campaign Council, lauded Governor Fubara for finding time to attend the ceremony and other engagements of the council in spite of his busy schedules.

Wike who is also the National Leader of the PDP/ Rainbow Coalition, reminded members of the newly inaugurated Presidential Campaign Council that each of them have been chosen based on their capacity to participate in the activities of the group and deliver positive results.

He charged them to work hard to win votes for the candidates of the APC and the Rainbow Coalition for the Presidential, Governorship, National Assembly as well as State House of Assembly elections next year.
He disclosed that apart from the Presidential Campaign Council and its Sub-Committees, the Local Government Campaign Councils will soon be inaugurated to ensure better coverage of the grassroots during the current campaign season.

Wike also emphasised the need for every member of the council to work hard towards the delivery of massive votes for the candidates of the APC and Rainbow Coalition in the forthcoming elections.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

HURIWA Demands Probe on Alleged N4m Medical Admission Racket in UNN,UNIZIK – Wants NUC, JAMB, Education Ministers to explain silence; -Urges ICPC to Investigate Allegation

Published

on

By

By George Mgbeleke

The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has raised the alarm over disturbing allegations of an admission racket in some South-East universities, where desperate candidates are reportedly being exploited and allegedly charged between N1.5 million and N4 million to secure admission to study Medicine and Surgery.

HURIWA described the allegations involving the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) and Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) as a potential national scandal that must not be swept under the carpet.

The association in a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko demanded an immediate, independent and far-reaching investigation by the Federal Government, warning that if the allegations are established, those responsible must be exposed, prosecuted and removed from positions of influence.

How did medical admission become a marketplace where money allegedly speaks louder than merit?

HURIWA said it was particularly disturbing that young Nigerians who spend years preparing for university entrance examinations could allegedly be denied admission despite impressive academic performances, while candidates with lower scores reportedly find their way into highly competitive medical programmes.

The association cited a disturbing account circulated by Alex Onyia, who questioned alleged exploitation of prospective medical students at UNN, claiming that candidates were being asked to pay between N1.5 million and N4 million to secure admission.

Another account attributed to a parent alleged that a candidate who scored 315 in UTME and obtained excellent O’level grades was denied admission to study Medicine and Surgery at UNIZIK and instead offered Biochemistry.

According to the account, the candidate reportedly discovered after resumption that some students with UTME scores of 250, 270, 280 and 300 had secured admission into Medicine and Surgery.

The parent said the candidate subsequently rewrote JAMB, scored 270 and gained admission to study Medicine and Surgery at a university in Northern Nigeria without allegedly knowing anyone or paying anyone to facilitate the process.

HURIWA said these allegations, although yet to be independently verified, raise fundamental questions about the integrity of medical admissions and the credibility of the institutions involved.

WHERE ARE THE NUC AND EDUCATION MINISTERS?

The association expressed outrage over what it described as the apparent silence of the National Universities Commission and the Federal Ministry of Education in the face of allegations capable of undermining the credibility of Nigeria’s university system.

HURIWA asked whether the regulatory authorities would wait until the allegations degenerate into a full-blown national scandal before taking action.

It insisted that the NUC must not remain a ceremonial regulator while allegations of financial manipulation and admission racketeering threaten the integrity of university education.

The association also challenged the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) to investigate discrepancies between candidates’ academic performances and admission outcomes in the affected institutions.

ICPC MUST NOT WAIT FOR PETITIONS

HURIWA called on the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to commence discreet investigations immediately rather than wait for formal complaints to land on its desk.

It urged the commission to examine the admission records of UNN and UNIZIK, identify possible intermediaries, investigate alleged financial transactions and establish whether university officials or external networks are involved.

The association further demanded a broad-based Federal Government investigation to identify the individuals behind any admission manipulation and ensure that anyone found culpable faces prosecution and appropriate disciplinary sanctions.

HURIWA also called for the establishment of nationwide NUC-JAMB monitoring task forces to conduct periodic checks on admission processes, particularly in highly competitive programmes such as Medicine and Surgery.

A DANGEROUS ASSAULT ON THE FUTURE OF NIGERIA’S HEALTHCARE

The association warned that the alleged commercialisation of medical admissions, if proven, would amount to more than an educational scandal.

It would raise serious concerns about the integrity of the process through which Nigeria selects and trains its future doctors.

HURIWA asked what would happen to public confidence in the medical profession if admission into medical schools became accessible to those with money and connections rather than candidates who meet established academic requirements.

The association warned that Nigeria cannot afford to turn medical education into a marketplace where wealthy candidates allegedly buy opportunities while academically qualified but less privileged students are pushed aside.

HURIWA insisted that university admission must be governed by merit, transparency and clearly defined academic standards, not alleged financial inducements, political connections or clandestine arrangements.

The association therefore challenged the Federal Government, NUC, JAMB and ICPC to act decisively.

The authorities must investigate, expose and prosecute anyone involved if these allegations are established. Nigeria’s medical schools must not become trading centres for admission slots.

Continue Reading

Latest

Law & Crime4 hours ago

Lifu Judgement : ADC Guber Candidates Forum Seeks Int. Community’s Intervention

By Grorge Abuja As the awaits the outcome of Justice Peter Lifu’s judgment invalidating Sen. David Mark led leadership of...

Uncategorized5 hours ago

UNN Confirms Death of Four Graduates at An Off-Campus Party

By John Nwafor The management of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), has declared a three-day mourning period following the...

Law & Crime5 hours ago

Niger Police Assures FUT Minna of Enhanced Security

BY UTHMAN BABA-NASEER,MINNA The Niger State Police Command has assured the management of the Federal University of Technology (FUT), Minna,...

Uncategorized10 hours ago

Fubaa: Rivers Caoable of deliverying znassive Votes fir Tinubu,Chinda, Others Charges APC, Rainbow Coalition to embrace team work

By George Mgbeleke Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, has declared that the State is capable of delivering massive...

Law & Crime10 hours ago

Suspected cultists kill rival member in Bayelsa, hid his mutilated corpse in a sack

By David Owei,Bayelsa There was a sense of horror in Yenagoa, the Bayelsà following the suspected cultists killing of a...

Law & Crime14 hours ago

HURIWA Condemns Detention of FIJ Journalist, Calls on Tinubu to Protect Press Freedom

By George Mgbeleke Association seeks Daniel Ojukwu’s release on bail, urges police to focus on insecurity and calls for safeguards...

Opinion14 hours ago

2027: Where Are the Trillions? Tinubu’s Loans,FAAC Windfall and Nigeria’s Economic Reality

By Abdullateef Bamgbose As the 2027 presidential campaign gathers momentum, political discourse appears to be drifting towards personality attacks, name-calling...

Uncategorized18 hours ago

HURIWA Demands Probe on Alleged N4m Medical Admission Racket in UNN,UNIZIK – Wants NUC, JAMB, Education Ministers to explain silence; -Urges ICPC to Investigate Allegation

By George Mgbeleke The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has raised the alarm over disturbing allegations of an...

Politics18 hours ago

APC Repackages 2023 Promises in New 2027 Manifestor-ADC — Says manifesto reads like that of a new party.

By Our Correspondent The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has described the newly released 2027 manifesto of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu...

Uncategorized1 day ago

ABER Congratulates Safari Gateway Ltd On Winning Best Safari Tour Operator World Tours Operator At World Tourism Awarld 2026

By David Owei,Bzylse Just as the World Tourism Forum Institute (WTFI) concluded it’s World Tourism Awards 2026 in Brussels under...

Trending