Opinion
Ex-prince Andrew’s arrest, lessons for Nigeria
By Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko
In Nigeria and in so much of the black continent of Africa, the institutions of law enforcement are only strong to the extent that those who are subjected to the full wrath of the law are not connected to the powers that be. In Nigeria, the citizens are not all equal before the law because most times, the law enforcers look at the faces of the people they ought to arrest and if they are connected to senior government officials, they are spared. In Nigeria, only the poor suffer whilst those connected to those who are in authority are excluded from the scrutiny mounted by the police. It is said that the officials of the law enforcement agencies are dictated to by senior government officials and instructed on how to go about enforcing the law.
In Nigeria, for instance, family members of those who wield political influences and powers such as the Governors and the President, are treated as sacred cows and the country pays so much to provide security cover for these privileged persons with filial connection to the public office holders. Definitely, in Nigeria, the direct children of the president and governors are assumed by the police to be above the law. Nigeria has been made to be a country in which individuals who wield political influences, behave as if they are bigger than even the institutions of law enforcement.
If for instance, the brother of the president is accused of any infraction such as the allegation of having sex with underage girls, or suspicion of misconduct in public office, it is definitely not possible to expect that the Nigeria Police Force can effect the arrest and prosecution of the accused individual. As stated earlier, those who have any direct links to those in political offices are treated differently from the rest of the people who are assumed to be the commoners.
In a lot of nations of Africa, for instance, in Nigeria or Uganda, the sons of the president behave as if they are above the law and these people enjoy unfettered access to the highest number of armed security forces moving about with them. In Uganda, the President somehow managed to find a slot in the Ugandan Army for his first son just as the Uganda political establishment railroaded the first son of the president of Uganda to the rank of a General and the father appointed him as head of the Defence sector. That first son of Yoweiri Museveni has been involved in high profile politically charged controversial incidents. He was recently accused of ordering the arrest of the opposition politician who recently challenged his father during the last presidential election which reportedly saw his father winning the election even after he has been the president for over three decades.
In Nigeria, the first son of the president, Mr. Seyi is living so large so much so that he enjoys very elaborate security details at public costs. Seyi is reportedly protected by soldiers, DSS operatives and the police. The son of president Tinubu is also rumoured to be so powerful and influential that he has been directly linked to some persons who got high federal appointments in his father’s administration through his influence.
It is even said in the media circles that within the office of the president, that there are two distinct cabals headed by Seyi and the other by the Chief of Staff to President Tinubu and these cabals are alleged to be influencing most of the decisions made by the current administration in Nigeria. Nobel laureate Professor Wole Soyinka recently voiced his condemnation of the massive security forces that protect just one person only because he is Seyi Tinubu. Soyinka’s public outburst was significant going by the fact that Soyinka had rarely spoken out against the actions or inactions of president Tinubu even when the administration has inflicted the harshest economic recessions in the history of Nigeria. Soyinka have always maintained sealed lips against President Tinubu. But he spoke out about Seyi who is enjoying so much of privileges only because he is the son of the president.
But this is not the same with advanced societies. In the United Kingdom, a senior member of the Royal family Andrew is under arrest by the police.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who until he was stripped of his Royal title of a Prince, has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office after police opened an investigation linked to his dealings with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein is the character behind the infamous Epstein files in which Andrew and several other powerful figures around the World were mentioned.
Thames Valley Police said officers detained a man in his sixties from Norfolk on Thursday morning and carried out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. The force did not name the suspect, in line with national guidance. Multiple British media outlets, including the BBC and The Guardian, identified the man as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
Police confirmed the man “remains in police custody at this time”. Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright said: “Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office. It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence.”
He added: “We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.”
International media cited photographs published on Thursday showed unmarked police vehicles and plainclothes officers at Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk shortly after 8am.
The BBC reported that searches were also under way at Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park, where Mountbatten-Windsor lived until recently. Norfolk Constabulary said it was “supporting a Thames Valley Police investigation into misconduct in a public office”.
The arrest took place on Mountbatten-Windsor’s 66th birthday. He moved earlier this month to Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate.
Already the King of England, King Charles 111 has publicly supported the decision of the police to arrest his brother who is eight in line tk the Royal throne. This is extraordinary and this truly demonstrates the principle that nobody is above the law.
King Charles has officially released a statement as follows:
“I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office,” Charles said, per the BBC. “What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities. In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course. As this process continues, it would not be right for me to comment further on this matter. Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all. Charles R.”
A British media outlet wrote that King Charles and other senior royals have maintained a “business as usual” approach this week, and “some senior royals” even have engagements later today.
A statement from the police reads “As part of the investigation, we have today (19/2) arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. The man remains in police custody at this time. We will not be naming the arrested man, as per national guidance. Please also remember that this case is now active so care should be taken with any publication to avoid being in contempt of court.”
The lessons or lesson for us in Nigeria and so much of the African continent, is that a society that does not respect equality before the law for all citizens, is unworthy of being categorised as civilised and democratic because civilisation and democracy only thrive when all citizens are treated equally before the law. And the truth is that until we in Nigeria and Africa allow the institutions of law enforcement to operate independently and freely and to ensure that nobody is above the law, then Nigeria and these African nations will continue to revolve around the chair of lack of development and we would be far from civilisation. Nigerians and Africans must be vigilant and insist on the supremacy of the rule of law.
Opinion
HURIWA Commends Senate’s Oversight On SEDC -Demands EFCC Probe,Arrests, Reconstitution of Commission’s Board
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has commended the Senate Committee on the South East Development Commission (SEDC), led by Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, for what it described as a courageous, diligent and constitutionally mandated exercise of legislative oversight in probing the financial activities of the South East Development Commission.

HURIWA
HURIWA in a statement signed by its National Coordinator,Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko said the revelations emerging from the Senate investigative hearing on the management of over N16.6 billion released to the Commission from the 2025 budget allocation raise disturbing questions that demand immediate intervention by anti-corruption and law enforcement agencies.
The rights group particularly expressed outrage over allegations presented before the Senate Committee that the Commission allegedly expended N153 million on the rent of a one-room liaison office in Abuja and listed another N2.5 billion under what was reportedly categorized as “implied expenditure.”
According to HURIWA, such allegations, if established through investigation, represent a shocking abuse of public trust and a reckless deployment of scarce public resources at a time millions of citizens in the South-East region continue to grapple with poor infrastructure, youth unemployment, insecurity, inadequate healthcare facilities and widespread economic hardship.
“The Nigerian people are entitled to know how every kobo appropriated for regional development is spent. The allegations emerging from the Senate hearing are deeply troubling and demand immediate, transparent and independent investigation. No public official entrusted with development funds should be allowed to treat public resources as personal assets.”
HURIWA specifically called on the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to immediately invite the Managing Director and relevant management officials of the South East Development Commission for interrogation and forensic scrutiny of all expenditures made from the N16.6 billion allocation.
The association stated that the Senate Committee has already performed its constitutional responsibility by exposing apparent discrepancies and demanding accountability and that anti-corruption agencies must now complement that effort through criminal and forensic investigations where necessary.
“If investigations establish financial misconduct, diversion of public funds, inflation of contracts, procurement violations or any form of abuse of office, arrests and prosecutions must follow without delay. Public office holders must understand that accountability is not negotiable and that impunity can no longer be tolerated in institutions created to uplift disadvantaged regions.”
HURIWA noted that the South East Development Commission was established to address decades of infrastructural deficits and developmental neglect in the region and not to become another bureaucratic structure for wasteful spending.
The association contrasted the emerging controversy with the performance of the North East Development Commission (NEDC), which it said has over the years executed numerous transformative projects across the six states of the North-East region.< According to HURIWA, despite challenges associated with post-insurgency reconstruction, the North East Development Commission has become visible through the construction and rehabilitation of roads, schools, hospitals, housing projects, water facilities and other critical infrastructure that have directly impacted millions of citizens. "The South East Development Commission was expected to emulate and even improve upon the developmental template established by the North East Development Commission. Unfortunately, what Nigerians are hearing at this stage are allegations of questionable expenditures rather than reports of transformational projects."
Consequently, HURIWA called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and relevant authorities to urgently review the governance architecture of the South East Development Commission and consider the immediate reconstitution of its governing board in the interest of transparency, credibility and effective service delivery.
HURIWA said that it has not categorically accused the hierarchy of the South East Development Commission of any crimes but stressed that development commissions must be managed by individuals whose commitment to integrity, accountability and prudent management of public resources is beyond reproach.
HURIWA urged the Senate Committee not to relent in its investigation and called on Nigerians, civil society organisations, professional bodies and stakeholders across the South-East to closely monitor developments surrounding the matter. HURIWA hopes that the investigative activities around the management of resources of the SEDC by the anti-graft institutions would be in a position to ascertain if anyone is guilty of these allegations or not. This is a clarion advocacy call for a full investigation.
“The South-East people deserve a development commission that works for the people and not for a privileged few. Every naira appropriated for development must translate into visible projects and measurable improvements in the lives of citizens. Anything short of this constitutes a betrayal of public trust.”
The association reaffirmed its commitment to supporting all lawful efforts aimed at promoting transparency, combating corruption and ensuring that public institutions remain accountable to the Nigerian people.
Opinion
HURIWA Commends Senate’s Oversight On SEDC -Demands EFCC Probe,Arrests, Reconstitution of Commission’s Board
Opinion
HURIWA questions FG’S evacuation plan for Nigerians fleeing xenophobia in South Africa; demands justice, compensation*
By George Mgbeleke
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has received with mixed feelings the announcement by the Federal Government of Nigeria regarding the planned evacuation of over 1,000 Nigerians from South Africa following the resurgence of xenophobic attacks against African migrants, including Nigerian citizens.
In a statement signed by National Coordinator,Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko the group said, “While we commend the Federal Government for eventually assuming responsibility for the transportation costs of the affected Nigerians and facilitating their safe return home, HURIWA believes that the evacuation exercise, standing alone, is grossly inadequate and fails to address the far-reaching humanitarian, economic, diplomatic, legal and moral dimensions of this recurring tragedy.
“Indeed, the proposed evacuation raises more questions than answers.
The first and perhaps most fundamental question is: What becomes of the accumulated wealth, businesses, investments, landed properties, shops, vehicles, equipment, bank deposits and other assets painstakingly acquired by Nigerians who are now being compelled by fear, insecurity and targeted hostility to abandon their lives in South Africa?
“Many of these Nigerians did not arrive in South Africa yesterday. They have lived there for years and, in many cases, for decades. They have paid taxes, established businesses, employed workers, contributed to local economies and built lives through hard work and enterprise. If these citizens are now being forced out by organised xenophobic violence, does the Nigerian government have a framework for pursuing restitution, compensation and legal protection for their assets?
“Will their losses simply be written off as collateral damage while government celebrates the evacuation of victims from a hostile environment?”
HURIWA submits that evacuation without compensation amounts to managing the consequences of injustice while ignoring the injustice itself.
Secondly, what becomes of the thousands of Nigerians who have established families in South Africa?
Many Nigerians are legally married to South African citizens and have children who possess dual heritage and whose identities are intertwined with both countries. These are not merely immigration statistics; they are families, spouses, children and communities.
Has the Nigerian government negotiated safeguards for these mixed-nationality families?
What becomes of the Nigerian husband whose South African wife cannot immediately relocate?
What becomes of the South African spouse whose Nigerian partner is forced to leave?
What happens to children whose education, healthcare, social relationships and future are rooted in South Africa?
What legal and humanitarian mechanisms are being put in place to prevent the fragmentation of families and the emotional trauma that often accompanies forced displacement?
Thirdly, HURIWA is compelled to ask whether Nigeria has fully exhausted the diplomatic mechanisms available through the African Union, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the United Nations system and other international human rights platforms before resorting to mass evacuation.
Nigeria is not an insignificant nation on the African continent.
Nigeria played pivotal roles in the liberation struggles of Southern Africa. Nigerian taxpayers contributed enormously to anti-apartheid campaigns. Nigeria sacrificed diplomatic, economic and political resources in support of the freedom and dignity of Black South Africans during the dark years of apartheid.
It is therefore deeply troubling that decades after apartheid, Nigerians and other Africans continue to face violent hostility in a country whose liberation Nigeria vigorously supported.
The question therefore is this: Has Nigeria sufficiently leveraged its historic moral authority and diplomatic influence to compel South Africa to discharge its constitutional and international obligations to protect every lawful resident within its territory regardless of nationality?
The recurring xenophobic attacks in South Africa are not merely criminal incidents. They represent repeated assaults on the ideals of African unity, Pan-African solidarity and human dignity.
Even more disturbing is the perception across Africa that perpetrators of xenophobic violence often act with a sense of impunity because accountability remains weak and consequences are minimal.
HURIWA therefore demands that the Nigerian government publicly disclose the diplomatic measures it has initiated to ensure accountability from South African authorities.
Has Nigeria demanded compensation for victims?
Has Nigeria sought guarantees against future attacks?
Has Nigeria requested the prosecution of perpetrators and organisers of xenophobic violence?
Has Nigeria demanded an independent investigation into allegations that some security institutions have either failed to act decisively or have looked the other way while foreign nationals were targeted?
These are legitimate questions that require immediate answers.
Furthermore, HURIWA believes Nigerians deserve to know whether the Federal Government has considered proportionate economic and diplomatic responses to the persistent victimisation of its citizens.
South African businesses continue to thrive in Nigeria under the protection of Nigerian laws and security institutions. Their investments are protected. Their personnel operate freely. Their commercial interests are safeguarded.
Yet, Nigerian citizens in South Africa continue to live under the recurring shadow of xenophobic violence.
While HURIWA is not advocating reckless retaliation, we insist that diplomacy must be accompanied by consequences where repeated violations occur without meaningful corrective action.
No nation that values its citizens should appear indifferent when those citizens are repeatedly subjected to violence, intimidation and displacement abroad.
Another critical concern is the fate of the more than 1,000 Nigerians expected to return home.
What specific reintegration framework has the Federal Government developed for them?
How many jobs have been created for them?
What financial support packages have been approved?
What business recovery schemes have been established?
What psychological counselling and trauma-support programmes have been designed for victims who may have witnessed violence, lost loved ones, lost businesses or suffered severe emotional distress?
The return of displaced citizens should not mark the end of government responsibility; rather, it should signal the beginning of a comprehensive rehabilitation process.
Anything short of that would amount to transporting victims from one crisis into another.
HURIWA therefore calls for the immediate establishment of a Presidential Task Force on the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Returnee Nigerians from South Africa, comprising relevant ministries, financial institutions, private-sector stakeholders, civil society organisations and diaspora representatives.
Such a body should be mandated to develop emergency economic assistance programmes, access-to-credit facilities, vocational support initiatives, business recovery grants and long-term reintegration strategies.
Finally, HURIWA warns that the recurring pattern of xenophobic violence against Africans in South Africa represents a grave threat to continental integration and the vision of a united Africa.
Africa cannot preach unity while Africans are hunted, intimidated and displaced in fellow African countries because of their nationality.
The dignity, security and rights of every African must be protected wherever they reside on the continent.
The Federal Government of Nigeria must therefore move beyond evacuation and pursue a comprehensive strategy anchored on justice, accountability, compensation, diplomatic firmness, protection of family rights, economic rehabilitation and the defence of the fundamental rights of Nigerian citizens. Indeed, these values should incorporated or rather become the centrepiece of Nigeria’s foreign policy direction and engraved in the constitution that is being amended.
Nigeria owes its citizens nothing less.
-
Politics1 year agoGov Okpebholo moves to end Cultism *Threatens action against leading cult groups *Vows to demolish more cult houses in Edo State
-
Politics10 months agoASUU-NDU protest against FG loans, unpaid salaries,Non-Implementation of agreements …..says loans is generational slavery
-
Business & Economy10 months agoPC-NCG Issues Disclaimer on Purported Nigerian Coast Guard National Orientation Exercise In Anambra State
-
Entertainment2 years agoJubilation galore as Parishioners of CKC Kurudu celebrate their cultural heritage ….FG should exploit our Cultural heritage to unite Nigerians-Rev Fr Dim
-
Sports4 months agoBayelsa-born ex-football star’s son, Opuama donates spike shoes to Athletics Association
-
General News2 years agoReps hold public hearing on FMC Ugwuaji Awkunanaw
-
Law & Crime11 months agoLegal practitioner raises alarm over threat to his life by CSP Muhammed Abdulkareem
-
General News2 years agoCelebration galore as UDA Successfully Elected New Exco ……I will digitalize processes that will raise UDA to greater height -Comr. Okejiri
